Pikwer Andreas, Acosta Stefan, Kölbel Tilo, Åkeson Jonas
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
J Vasc Access. 2010 Oct-Dec;11(4):323-8. doi: 10.5301/jva.2010.5813.
This study was designed to assess endovascular intervention for central venous cannulation in patients with vascular occlusion after previous catheterization.
Patients referred for endovascular management of central venous occlusion during a 42-month period were identified from a regional endovascular database, providing prospective information on techniques and clinical outcome. Corresponding patient records, angiograms, and radiographic reports were analyzed retrospectively.
Sixteen patients aged 48 years (range 0.5-76), including 11 females, were included. All patients but 1 had had multiple central venous catheters with a median total indwelling time of 37 months. Eleven patients cannulated for hemodialysis had had significantly fewer individual catheters inserted compared with 5 patients cannulated for nutritional support (mean 3.6 vs. 10.2, p<0.001) before endovascular intervention. Preoperative imaging by magnetic resonance tomography (MRT) in 8 patients, computed tomography (CT) venography in 3, conventional angiography in 6, and/or ultrasonography in 8, verified 15 brachiocephalic, 13 internal jugular, 3 superior caval, and/or 3 subclavian venous occlusions. Patients were subjected to recanalization (n=2), recanalization and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (n=5), or stenting for vena cava superior syndrome (n=1) prior to catheter insertion. The remaining 8 patients were cannulated by avoiding the occluded route.
Central venous occlusion occurs particularly in patients under hemodialysis and with a history of multiple central venous catheterizations with large-diameter catheters and/or long total indwelling time periods. Patients with central venous occlusion verified by CT or MRT venography and need for central venous access should be referred for endovascular intervention.
本研究旨在评估血管内介入治疗在既往插管后血管闭塞患者中心静脉置管的应用。
从区域血管内数据库中识别出在42个月期间因中心静脉闭塞接受血管内治疗的患者,该数据库提供了有关技术和临床结果的前瞻性信息。对相应的患者记录、血管造影和影像学报告进行回顾性分析。
纳入16例年龄48岁(范围0.5 - 76岁)的患者,其中11例为女性。除1例患者外,所有患者均有多根中心静脉导管,总留置时间中位数为37个月。与5例接受营养支持置管的患者相比,11例接受血液透析置管的患者在血管内介入治疗前插入的单个导管明显更少(平均3.6根对10.2根,p<0.001)。8例患者术前行磁共振断层扫描(MRT)、3例患者行计算机断层扫描(CT)静脉造影、6例患者行传统血管造影和/或8例患者行超声检查,证实有15例头臂静脉、13例颈内静脉、3例上腔静脉和/或3例锁骨下静脉闭塞。在插入导管前,患者接受了再通治疗(n = 2)、再通及经皮腔内血管成形术(n = 5)或上腔静脉综合征支架置入术(n = 1)。其余8例患者通过避开闭塞路径进行置管。
中心静脉闭塞尤其发生在接受血液透析且有多次使用大口径导管和/或总留置时间长的中心静脉置管史的患者中。经CT或MRT静脉造影证实有中心静脉闭塞且需要中心静脉通路的患者应转诊接受血管内介入治疗。