Pejcić Ivica, Vrbić Svetislav, Filipović Sladjana, Sćekić Mirjana, Petković Ivan, Pejcić Ljiljana, Djenić Nebojsa
Univerzitetski klinicki centar Nis, Klinika za onkologiju, Srbija.
Vojnosanit Pregl. 2010 Sep;67(9):723-31. doi: 10.2298/vsp1009723p.
BACKGROUND/AIM: Unknown primary tumors represent a heterogeneous group of malignancies that are indicative of ominous prognosis. Cancer of unknown primary site (CUP) is defined as the lack of any detectable primary site after full evaluation, and accounts for approximately 3-5% of all newly diagnosed patients with malignancies. The aim of this report was to present the prognostic and predictive value of 8 serum tumor markers in this group of patients.
The study involved 63 patients. On histological examination, all the patients were presented with metastatic tumors whose primary site (origin) could not be detected with noninvasive diagnostic techniques. Following the routine light microscopy, all histological findings were classified into one of the following three groups: plano-cellular carcinoma--8 patients; adenocarcinoma--33 patients; unclassifiable (undifferentiated) carcinoma--22 patients. In all the cases we evaluated 8 serum tumor markers: alpha-fetoproteins (AFP), chronic gonadotrophin beta submit, human (beta-HCG), neuron specific enolase (NSE), marker of malignant ovarian tumors (CA 125), prostate-specific antigene (PSA), marker of malignant brest tumor (CA 15-3), marker of malignant pancreas tumor and gastrointestinal tumor (Ca 19-9), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) at the time of diagnosis. The patients on chemotherapy had the markers determined after the third and sixth chemocycle, i.e. at the time of illness progression observation, if present. The patients responding to chemotherapy with complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) had the markers determined after three-month periods until the time of relapse or progression. Chemotherapy was applied in 32 patients (20 females and 12 males), aged 29-70 years, who met the inclusion criteria. The following chemotherapy regimen was used: doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 (day 1), cisplatin 60 mg/m2 (day 1), and etoposide 120 mg/m2 (days 1-3). The period between two chemotherapy cycles was three weeks, and maximum five weeks in the case of prolonged hematological toxicity.
Most commonly elevated were NSE values (82.54%), while AFP values were least commonly elevated (11.11%). Average survival time was 17.89 months (95% CI 12.96; 22.83). The probability of 24 months' survival was 0.228. The group of 32 patients treated with chemotherapy had 12 (37.5%) fatal outcomes in the observed period (72 months). Average survival time was 26.6 months (95% CI 19.5; 33.7). Average tumor marker values before and after the chemotherapy were significantly lower for NSE and CA 125. Survival was significantly better in cases of NSE and CA 125 decrease of more than 20%.
Increased values of serum tumor markers are very often in CUP. The tumors show nonspecific overexpression of tumor markers. The NSE and CA 125 levels show good correlation with response to the given chemotherapy. However, a routine evaluation of commonly used serum tumor markers has not been proven of any prognostic and predictive assistance.
背景/目的:原发灶不明的肿瘤是一组异质性恶性肿瘤,提示预后不良。原发部位不明的癌症(CUP)定义为经过全面评估后仍未发现任何可检测到的原发部位,约占所有新诊断恶性肿瘤患者的3%-5%。本报告的目的是阐述8种血清肿瘤标志物在该组患者中的预后和预测价值。
该研究纳入63例患者。经组织学检查,所有患者均表现为转移性肿瘤,其原发部位(起源)无法通过非侵入性诊断技术检测到。经过常规光学显微镜检查后,所有组织学结果被分为以下三组之一:扁平细胞癌——8例患者;腺癌——33例患者;无法分类(未分化)癌——22例患者。在所有病例中,我们在诊断时评估了8种血清肿瘤标志物:甲胎蛋白(AFP)、人绒毛膜促性腺激素β亚基(β-HCG)、神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)、恶性卵巢肿瘤标志物(CA 125)、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、恶性乳腺肿瘤标志物(CA 15-3)、恶性胰腺肿瘤和胃肠道肿瘤标志物(Ca 19-9)、癌胚抗原(CEA)。接受化疗的患者在第三个和第六个化疗周期后,即在疾病进展观察时(如果有)测定这些标志物。对化疗有完全缓解(CR)、部分缓解(PR)或疾病稳定(SD)反应的患者,在三个月期间测定标志物,直至复发或进展。32例符合纳入标准的患者(20例女性和12例男性,年龄29-70岁)接受了化疗。采用以下化疗方案:阿霉素50mg/m²(第1天)、顺铂60mg/m²(第1天)、依托泊苷120mg/m²(第1-3天)。两个化疗周期之间的间隔为三周,若血液学毒性延长则最长为五周。
最常升高的是NSE值(82.54%),而AFP值最不常升高(11.11%)。平均生存时间为[17.89个月(95%可信区间12.96;22.83)]。24个月生存概率为0.228。在观察期(72个月)内,32例接受化疗的患者中有12例(37.5%)死亡。平均生存时间为26.6个月(95%可信区间19.5;33.7)。化疗前后NSE和CA 125的平均肿瘤标志物值显著降低。NSE和CA 125降低超过20%的患者生存情况明显更好。
血清肿瘤标志物值在CUP中常常升高。肿瘤表现出肿瘤标志物的非特异性过表达。NSE和CA 125水平与对给定化疗的反应显示出良好的相关性。然而,尚未证明对常用血清肿瘤标志物进行常规评估有任何预后和预测帮助。