Department of Psychology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Nov;99(5):870-82. doi: 10.1037/a0020963.
Consensus studies from 4 cultures--in Belgium, the Czech Republic, Estonia, and Germany--as well as secondary analyses of self- and observer-reported Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) data from 29 cultures suggest that there is a cross-culturally replicable pattern of difference between internal and external perspectives for the Big Five personality traits. People see themselves as more neurotic and open to experience compared to how they are seen by other people. External observers generally hold a higher opinion of an individual's conscientiousness than he or she does about him- or herself. As a rule, people think that they have more positive emotions and excitement seeking but much less assertiveness than it seems from the vantage point of an external observer. This cross-culturally replicable disparity between internal and external perspectives was not consistent with predictions based on the actor-observer hypothesis because the size of the disparity was unrelated to the visibility of personality traits. A relatively strong negative correlation (r = -.53) between the average self-minus-observer profile and social desirability ratings suggests that people in most studied cultures view themselves less favorably than they are perceived by others.
来自 4 个国家/地区(比利时、捷克共和国、爱沙尼亚和德国)的共识研究,以及对来自 29 个国家/地区的自我和观察者报告的修订 NEO 人格量表(NEO PI-R)数据的二次分析表明,对于五大人格特质,存在一种跨文化可复制的内部和外部视角差异模式。与他人对自己的看法相比,人们认为自己更神经质,更愿意接受新体验。外部观察者通常对一个人的责任心评价高于他或她对自己的评价。通常情况下,人们认为自己拥有更多的积极情绪和寻求刺激,但从外部观察者的角度来看,他们的自信程度要低得多。这种内部和外部视角之间的跨文化可复制差异与基于演员-观察者假设的预测不一致,因为差异的大小与人格特质的可见度无关。自我-观察者剖面图的平均值与社会期望评分之间存在较强的负相关(r = -.53),这表明在大多数研究文化中,人们对自己的看法不如他人对他们的看法。