Bauer M, Baab R
Universität Regensburg, Institut für Psychologie, Lehrstuhl für Psychologie I.
Blutalkohol. 1995 Jan;32(1):8-25.
Assessing the problem of "alcohol in road traffic" it becomes apparent that most offenders have high BACs (in excess of 1.6 per mille) and that they are repeating offenders. It can therefore be assumed that those people are drink-drivers, which means that, when assessing the offence, the offender's personality as a whole has to be taken into consideration. The DUI offenders themselves usually justify the offence by balming it on the circumstances of a given situation. On the basis of this discrepancy, the published study deals with the question of whether there are any differences between the way DUI offenders judge their personality and self concept and the way other people do. This also leads to the questions of whether the number of offences play a role or not. The self image of 60 male DUI offenders was rated by means of the Giessen test and the Frankfurt self concept scales "problem solving", "confidence in behaviour and decision making", as well as "judgement by others". For the outside judgement, 60 male volunteers were asked to judge DUI convicted drivers. It showed that the DUI convicted drivers assessed their personality to be no different than that of the average person. Their self concept was characterised by positive attributes. However, the outside judgement showed them to be less socially responsive, lacking self control, as well as rather dominant, depressive, reserved and rather inhibited in heterosexual relationships. The self judgement changes with an increasing number of offences, as does the outside judgement to an even greater extend. The latter turns into a more negative judgement. Regarding the self concepts, only the outside judgement proved to be more negative. The number of convictions didn't influence the DUI offenders' self estimation.
在评估“道路交通中的酒精问题”时,很明显大多数违法者血液酒精浓度(BAC)很高(超过千分之一百六十),而且他们是惯犯。因此可以假定这些人是酒后驾车者,这意味着在评估违法行为时,必须考虑违法者的整体个性。酒后驾车违法者自己通常将违法行为归咎于特定情况的环境来为自己辩解。基于这种差异,已发表的研究探讨了酒后驾车违法者判断自己个性和自我概念的方式与其他人判断方式之间是否存在差异的问题。这也引出了违法次数是否起作用的问题。通过吉森测试以及法兰克福自我概念量表“解决问题”“行为和决策信心”以及“他人评价”对60名男性酒后驾车违法者的自我形象进行了评估。对于外部评价,让60名男性志愿者对被判酒后驾车罪的司机进行评价。结果显示,被判酒后驾车罪的司机认为自己的个性与普通人没有差别。他们的自我概念具有积极的特征。然而,外部评价显示他们社交反应较差、缺乏自我控制能力,而且相当专横、抑郁、内向,在异性关系中相当拘谨。自我判断随着违法次数的增加而变化,外部评价的变化程度更大。后者变成了更负面的评价。关于自我概念,只有外部评价被证明更负面。定罪次数并未影响酒后驾车违法者的自我评估。