• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康投资和父母偏爱对儿童的长期影响:以母乳喂养为例。

Long-term effects of health investments and parental favoritism: the case of breastfeeding.

机构信息

Division of Health Policy and Administration, School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.

出版信息

Health Econ. 2011 Nov;20(11):1349-61. doi: 10.1002/hec.1675. Epub 2010 Oct 18.

DOI:10.1002/hec.1675
PMID:20960419
Abstract

This paper re-examines the effects of breastfeeding on long-term educational outcomes using longitudinal data on siblings. While family-fixed effects allow controls for all shared family factors, these estimators are sensitive to compensating or reinforcing behaviors by parents. These biases may be particularly important for estimating the effects of parental investment such as breast feeding, where sibling discordance may be difficult to treat as a random outcome and may result in persistence in differential investments between siblings. This paper uses a unique question asked to adolescent siblings about parental favoritism to adjust for potential reinforcing behavior by parents. Standard fixed effects estimates suggest important long-term educational effects of breastfeeding; however, these effects are uniformly eliminated after focusing on families who treat siblings equally. These findings shed light on the mechanisms linking associations between breastfeeding and longer term outcomes.

摘要

本文利用兄弟姐妹的纵向数据,重新考察了母乳喂养对长期教育成果的影响。虽然家庭固定效应允许控制所有共同的家庭因素,但这些估计对父母的补偿或强化行为很敏感。这些偏差对于估计父母投资(如母乳喂养)的影响可能尤为重要,因为兄弟姐妹之间的不和谐可能难以视为随机结果,并且可能导致兄弟姐妹之间的投资差异持续存在。本文利用一个独特的问题,询问青少年兄弟姐妹关于父母偏心的问题,以调整父母潜在的强化行为。标准固定效应估计表明母乳喂养有重要的长期教育效果;然而,在关注平等对待兄弟姐妹的家庭后,这些影响都被统一消除了。这些发现为母乳喂养与更长期结果之间的关联机制提供了线索。

相似文献

1
Long-term effects of health investments and parental favoritism: the case of breastfeeding.健康投资和父母偏爱对儿童的长期影响:以母乳喂养为例。
Health Econ. 2011 Nov;20(11):1349-61. doi: 10.1002/hec.1675. Epub 2010 Oct 18.
2
Double impact: what sibling data can tell us about the long-term negative effects of parental divorce.双重影响:兄弟姐妹的数据能告诉我们关于父母离异的长期负面影响的哪些信息。
Soc Biol. 2003 Spring-Summer;50(1-2):58-76.
3
Breastfeeding as obesity prevention in the United States: a sibling difference model.母乳喂养作为美国肥胖预防的一种方法:基于同胞差异的研究模型。
Am J Hum Biol. 2010 May-Jun;22(3):291-6. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.20982.
4
Breastfeeding and child disability: a comparison of siblings from the United States.母乳喂养与儿童残疾:来自美国的兄弟姐妹对比研究
Econ Hum Biol. 2014 Dec;15:13-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2014.05.004. Epub 2014 May 28.
5
Similarities in siblings' experiences of neglectful parenting behaviors.兄弟姐妹在遭受忽视型养育行为经历上的相似之处。
Child Abuse Negl. 2006 Jun;30(6):619-37. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2005.11.008. Epub 2006 Jun 16.
6
Parental use of differential restrictive feeding practices with siblings.父母对兄弟姐妹采用不同的限制性喂养方式。
Int J Pediatr Obes. 2011 Jun;6(2-2):e540-6. doi: 10.3109/17477166.2011.575144. Epub 2011 May 26.
7
Longitudinal associations between parents' hostility and siblings' externalizing behavior in the context of marital discord.在婚姻不和的背景下,父母敌意与兄弟姐妹外化行为之间的纵向关联。
J Fam Psychol. 2008 Apr;22(2):231-40. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.22.2.231.
8
Adolescent depression and educational attainment: results using sibling fixed effects.青少年抑郁与受教育程度:使用同胞固定效应的研究结果
Health Econ. 2010 Jul;19(7):855-71. doi: 10.1002/hec.1526.
9
Young adult sibling relations: the effects of perceived parental favoritism and narcissism.青少年时期的兄弟姐妹关系:感知到的父母偏爱和自恋的影响。
J Psychol. 2011 Jan-Feb;145(1):1-22. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2010.528073.
10
Is breast truly best? Estimating the effects of breastfeeding on long-term child health and wellbeing in the United States using sibling comparisons.母乳喂养真的更好吗?利用兄弟姐妹对照评估美国母乳喂养对儿童长期健康和福利的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 May;109:55-65. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.027. Epub 2014 Jan 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Braving the dark: mental health challenges and academic performance of Ukrainian university students during the war.勇对黑暗:战争期间乌克兰大学生的心理健康挑战与学业表现
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2025 Mar 3. doi: 10.1007/s00127-025-02867-7.
2
Integrating motherhood and employment: A 22-year analysis investigating impacts of US workplace breastfeeding policy.兼顾母亲身份与就业:一项为期22年的分析,探究美国职场母乳喂养政策的影响。
SSM Popul Health. 2020 Apr 11;11:100580. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100580. eCollection 2020 Aug.
3
To cause or not to cause? That is the question, but identical twins might not have all of the answers.
导致还是不导致?这就是问题所在,但同卵双胞胎可能并非知晓所有答案。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Feb;127:198-200. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.10.013. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
4
Interactive effects of in utero nutrition and genetic inheritance on cognition: new evidence using sibling comparisons.宫内营养与遗传基因对认知的交互影响:利用同胞比较得出的新证据。
Econ Hum Biol. 2014 Mar;13:144-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2013.09.001. Epub 2013 Oct 13.