Atlantic Health Promotion Research Centre, Faculty of Health Professions, Dalhousie University, Canada.
Implement Sci. 2010 Oct 20;5:79. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-79.
Health systems face challenges in using research evidence to improve policy and practice. These challenges are particularly evident in small and poorly resourced health systems, which are often in locations (in Canada and globally) with poorer health status. Although organizational resources have been acknowledged as important in understanding research use resource theories have not been a focus of knowledge translation (KT) research. What resources, broadly defined, are required for KT and how does their presence or absence influence research use?In this paper, we consider conservation of resources (COR) theory as a theoretical basis for understanding the capacity to use research evidence in health systems. Three components of COR theory are examined in the context of KT. First, resources are required for research uptake. Second, threat of resource loss fosters resistance to research use. Third, resources can be optimized, even in resource-challenged environments, to build capacity for KT.
A scan of the KT literature examined organizational resources needed for research use. A multiple case study approach examined the three components of COR theory outlined above. The multiple case study consisted of a document review and key informant interviews with research team members, including government decision-makers and health practitioners through a retrospective analysis of four previously conducted applied health research studies in a resource-challenged region.
The literature scan identified organizational resources that influence research use. The multiple case study supported these findings, contributed to the development of a taxonomy of organizational resources, and revealed how fears concerning resource loss can affect research use. Some resources were found to compensate for other resource deficits. Resource needs differed at various stages in the research use process.
COR theory contributes to understanding the role of resources in research use, resistance to research use, and potential strategies to enhance research use. Resources (and a lack of them) may account for the observed disparities in research uptake across health systems. This paper offers a theoretical foundation to guide further examination of the COR-KT ideas and necessary supports for research use in resource-challenged environments.
卫生系统在利用研究证据改善政策和实践方面面临挑战。这些挑战在小型和资源匮乏的卫生系统中尤为明显,这些系统通常位于(在加拿大和全球范围内)健康状况较差的地方。尽管组织资源已被认为是理解研究利用的重要因素,但资源理论并不是知识转化(KT)研究的重点。广泛定义的,需要哪些资源用于 KT,它们的存在或缺失如何影响研究的使用?在本文中,我们认为保护资源(COR)理论是理解卫生系统中使用研究证据的能力的理论基础。 COR 理论的三个组成部分在 KT 的背景下进行了检查。首先,需要资源来进行研究吸收。其次,资源损失的威胁会助长对研究使用的抵制。第三,即使在资源匮乏的环境中,也可以优化资源,以建立 KT 的能力。
对 KT 文献进行了扫描,以检查研究使用所需的组织资源。采用多案例研究方法,考察了上文概述的 COR 理论的三个组成部分。多案例研究包括对四个先前在资源匮乏地区进行的应用健康研究的回顾性分析,对研究团队成员(包括政府决策者和卫生从业人员)的文件审查和关键信息访谈。
文献扫描确定了影响研究使用的组织资源。多案例研究支持了这些发现,为组织资源分类法的发展做出了贡献,并揭示了对资源损失的恐惧如何影响研究的使用。一些资源被发现可以弥补其他资源的不足。在研究使用过程的不同阶段,资源需求有所不同。
COR 理论有助于理解资源在研究使用、对研究使用的抵制以及增强研究使用的潜在策略中的作用。资源(和缺乏资源)可能解释了观察到的不同卫生系统之间在研究吸收率方面的差异。本文提供了一个理论基础,以指导进一步研究 COR-KT 思想以及资源匮乏环境中研究使用的必要支持。