Cirasino Lorenzo, Robino Anna M, Cattaneo Marco, Pioltelli Pietro E, Pogliani Enrico M, Morra Enrica, Colombo Paola, Palmieri Giancarlo A
Divisione Medica II dell'Ospedale Niguarda Ca' Granda, Divisioni di Ematologia, Italy.
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2011 Jan;22(1):1-6. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0b013e3283401286.
Despite the accepted distinction between primary and secondary immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), a systematic analysis of the incidence of secondary ITP is not available. The present study was aimed at verifying the frequency and, consequently, the approximate rates of prevalence and incidence of secondary ITP and analysing its clinical and laboratory characteristics in patients needing ordinary hospital treatment for ITP. The study was based on 79 consecutive, adult ITP patients admitted to three Italian hospitals in 2000-2002. Using data collected in a previous study on the appropriateness of hospital management of ITP, we evaluated the frequency of secondary ITP, with the diagnosis formulated on the basis of new acquisitions, derived its rates of prevalence and incidence, and examined the available clinical and laboratory parameters. At our case review, a diagnosis of secondary ITP could be formulated in 38% of the 79 patients. This frequency was significantly higher than that determined at the time the patients were discharged from hospital (13.9%) (P = 0.000). The derived rates of prevalence and incidence of secondary ITP in the general population were, respectively, 2.3 and 1.23 per 100 000 inhabitants per year. In comparison with patients with primary ITP, those with a secondary form more frequently had spleen enlargement (P = 0.000), hepatomegaly (P = 0.001) and lower haemoglobin values (P = 0.005). The high frequency of secondary ITP must be mainly attributed to the currently available knowledge about the nature of some forms of ITP. Particular contributors to the high frequency were cases secondary to infections and those observed in patients who had undergone bone marrow or solid organ transplantation. Some clinical and laboratory alterations appear to be more frequent in secondary ITP than in primary ITP. However, the importance that the identification of particular forms of ITP, such as those secondary to Helicobacter pylori or hepatitis C virus infections, has on the choice of treatment suggests that these conditions must be ascertained independently of the presence or absence of clinical and laboratory alterations.
尽管原发性免疫性血小板减少性紫癜(ITP)和继发性免疫性血小板减少性紫癜之间的区别已被认可,但目前尚无对继发性ITP发病率的系统分析。本研究旨在核实继发性ITP的发生频率,进而得出其大致的患病率和发病率,并分析需要在普通医院接受ITP治疗的患者的临床和实验室特征。该研究基于2000 - 2002年期间连续收治于三家意大利医院的79例成年ITP患者。利用先前一项关于ITP医院管理适宜性研究中收集的数据,我们评估了继发性ITP的发生频率(诊断基于新发现做出),得出其患病率和发病率,并检查了现有的临床和实验室参数。在我们的病例回顾中,79例患者中有38%可诊断为继发性ITP。这一频率显著高于患者出院时确定的频率(13.9%)(P = 0.000)。继发性ITP在普通人群中的患病率和发病率分别为每年每10万居民2.3例和1.23例。与原发性ITP患者相比,继发性ITP患者更常出现脾肿大(P = 0.000)、肝肿大(P = 0.001)和血红蛋白值较低(P = 0.005)。继发性ITP的高频率主要归因于目前对某些形式ITP本质的认识。导致高频率的特别因素是感染继发的病例以及在接受骨髓或实体器官移植的患者中观察到的病例。某些临床和实验室改变在继发性ITP中似乎比在原发性ITP中更常见。然而,识别特定形式的ITP(如幽门螺杆菌或丙型肝炎病毒感染继发的ITP)对治疗选择的重要性表明,无论是否存在临床和实验室改变,都必须独立确定这些情况。