Suppr超能文献

非典型抗精神病药物(喹硫平、利培酮、阿立哌唑和帕利哌酮)与安慰剂或典型抗精神病药物治疗难治性精神分裂症的疗效和安全性比较:系统评价概述

Efficacy and safety of atypical antipsychotic drugs (quetiapine, risperidone, aripiprazole and paliperidone) compared with placebo or typical antipsychotic drugs for treating refractory schizophrenia: overview of systematic reviews.

作者信息

Melnik Tamara, Soares Bernardo Garcia, Puga Maria Eduarda Dos Santos, Atallah Alvaro Nagib

机构信息

Brazilian Cochrane Center, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Sao Paulo Med J. 2010 May;128(3):141-66. doi: 10.1590/s1516-31802010000300007.

Abstract

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE

According to some cohort studies, the prevalence of refractory schizophrenia (RS) is 20-40%. Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of aripiprazole, paliperidone, quetiapine and risperidone for treating RS.

METHODS

This was a critical appraisal of Cochrane reviews published in the Cochrane Library, supplemented with reference to more recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on RS. The following databases were searched: Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (Medline) (1966-2009), Controlled Trials of the Cochrane Collaboration (2009, Issue 2), Embase (Excerpta Medica) (1980-2009), Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (Lilacs) (1982-2009). There was no language restriction. Randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses evaluating atypical antipsychotics for treating RS were included.

RESULTS

Seven Cochrane systematic reviews and 10 additional RCTs were included in this review. The data generally showed minor differences between the atypical antipsychotics evaluated and typical antipsychotics, regarding improvement in disease symptoms, despite better adherence to treatment with atypical antipsychotics. Risperidone was specifically evaluated in patients with RS in one of the systematic reviews included, with favorable outcomes, but without definitive superiority compared with other drugs of proven efficacy, like amisulpride, clozapine and olanzapine.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings underscore the difficulty in treating these patients, with high dropout rates and treatment patterns of modest improvement in assessments of effectiveness. Atypical antipsychotics have advantages over typical antipsychotics mainly through their better safety profile, which leads to better adherence to treatment. A combination of antipsychotics may also be an option for some refractory patients.

摘要

背景与目的

根据一些队列研究,难治性精神分裂症(RS)的患病率为20%-40%。我们的目的是评估阿立哌唑、帕利哌酮、喹硫平和利培酮治疗RS的有效性和安全性。

方法

这是对发表在Cochrane图书馆的Cochrane综述的批判性评价,并参考了关于RS的更新的随机对照试验(RCT)。检索了以下数据库:医学文献分析和检索系统在线(Medline)(1966 - 2009年)、Cochrane协作网对照试验(2009年,第2期)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(Embase)(1980 - 2009年)、拉丁美洲和加勒比卫生科学文献数据库(Lilacs)(1982 - 2009年)。无语言限制。纳入评估非典型抗精神病药物治疗RS的随机对照试验、系统评价和荟萃分析。

结果

本综述纳入了7篇Cochrane系统评价和10篇其他RCT。数据总体显示,在所评估的非典型抗精神病药物与典型抗精神病药物之间,尽管非典型抗精神病药物的治疗依从性更好,但在疾病症状改善方面差异较小。在纳入的一篇系统评价中,对利培酮在RS患者中的疗效进行了专门评估,结果良好,但与其他已证实有效的药物(如氨磺必利、氯氮平和奥氮平)相比,并无绝对优势。

结论

研究结果强调了治疗这些患者的困难,存在高脱落率以及有效性评估中改善程度有限的治疗模式。非典型抗精神病药物优于典型抗精神病药物,主要体现在其更好的安全性,这导致更好的治疗依从性。对于一些难治性患者,联合使用抗精神病药物也可能是一种选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b06/10938951/50686995d690/1806-9460-spmj-128-03-141-gf01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验