Department of Psychiatry University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Jan;74(1):10-8. doi: 10.4088/JCP.12m08001. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
To compare longer-term safety and effectiveness of the 4 most commonly used atypical antipsychotics (aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone) in 332 patients, aged > 40 years, having psychosis associated with schizophrenia, mood disorders, posttraumatic stress disorder, or dementia, diagnosed using DSM-IV-TR criteria.
We used equipoise-stratified randomization (a hybrid of complete randomization and clinician's choice methods) that allowed patients or their treating psychiatrists to exclude 1 or 2 of the study atypical antipsychotics due to past experience or anticipated risk. Patients were followed for up to 2 years, with assessments at baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and every 12 weeks thereafter. Medications were administered employing open-label design and flexible dosages, but with blind raters. The study was conducted from October 2005 to October 2010.
Primary metabolic markers (body mass index, blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides), percentage of patients who stay on the randomly assigned atypical antipsychotic for at least 6 months, psychopathology, percentage of patients who develop metabolic syndrome, and percentage of patients who develop serious and nonserious adverse events.
Because of a high incidence of serious adverse events, quetiapine was discontinued midway through the trial. There were significant differences among patients willing to be randomized to different atypical antipsychotics (P < .01), suggesting that treating clinicians tended to exclude olanzapine and prefer aripiprazole as one of the possible choices in patients with metabolic problems. Yet, the atypical antipsychotic groups did not differ in longitudinal changes in metabolic parameters or on most other outcome measures. Overall results suggested a high discontinuation rate (median duration 26 weeks prior to discontinuation), lack of significant improvement in psychopathology, and high cumulative incidence of metabolic syndrome (36.5% in 1 year) and of serious (23.7%) and nonserious (50.8%) adverse events for all atypical antipsychotics in the study.
Employing a study design that closely mimicked clinical practice, we found a lack of effectiveness and a high incidence of side effects with 4 commonly prescribed atypical antipsychotics across diagnostic groups in patients over age 40, with relatively few differences among the drugs. Caution in the use of these drugs is warranted in middle-aged and older patients.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00245206.
比较 4 种最常用的非典型抗精神病药物(阿立哌唑、奥氮平、喹硫平和利培酮)在 332 名年龄 > 40 岁的精神病患者中的长期安全性和有效性,这些患者患有与精神分裂症、心境障碍、创伤后应激障碍或痴呆相关的精神病,诊断标准采用 DSM-IV-TR。
我们使用均衡分层随机化(完全随机化和临床医生选择方法的混合),允许患者或其治疗精神科医生根据过去的经验或预期风险排除研究中的 1 或 2 种非典型抗精神病药物。患者接受长达 2 年的随访,在基线、6 周、12 周和此后每 12 周进行评估。药物采用开放标签设计和灵活剂量,但盲法评估。研究于 2005 年 10 月至 2010 年 10 月进行。
由于严重不良事件发生率较高,喹硫平在试验中途被停用。愿意接受随机分组的患者之间存在显著差异(P <.01),这表明治疗医生倾向于排除奥氮平和利培酮,并在代谢问题患者中作为可能的选择之一首选阿立哌唑。然而,不同非典型抗精神病药物组在代谢参数的纵向变化或其他大多数结局指标上没有差异。总体结果表明,停药率较高(中位停药时间为 26 周),精神病学症状无显著改善,代谢综合征发生率较高(1 年内为 36.5%),所有研究中的非典型抗精神病药物均有严重(23.7%)和非严重(50.8%)不良事件发生。
采用模拟临床实践的研究设计,我们发现,在年龄 > 40 岁的患者中,4 种常用非典型抗精神病药物在不同诊断组中疗效不佳,且副作用发生率高,而这些药物之间的差异相对较小。在中年和老年患者中使用这些药物时需谨慎。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT00245206。