Suppr超能文献

药物洗脱支架置入术后伴或不伴糖尿病患者血管反应的不同模式:光学相干断层成像分析。

Different patterns of vascular response between patients with or without diabetes mellitus after drug-eluting stent implantation: optical coherence tomographic analysis.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Toyohashi Heart Center, Toyohashi, Japan.

出版信息

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Oct;3(10):1074-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.08.006.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We performed this study to investigate with optical coherence tomography (OCT) the vascular response after sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation between patients with and those without diabetes mellitus (DM).

BACKGROUND

The difference in vascular response after SES implantation between patients with and those without DM has not been fully evaluated with OCT.

METHODS

Optical coherence tomography was performed to examine 74 nonrestenotic SES implanted in 63 patients (32 with DM and 31 without DM) at 9 months after SES implantation. For struts showing neointimal coverage, the neointimal thickness on the luminal side of each strut section was measured, and neointimal characteristics were classified into high, low, and layered signal pattern.

RESULTS

Baseline patient characteristics and lesion and procedural characteristics data were similar between the 2 groups. In total, 11,422 struts were analyzed. High signal neointima was observed in 90.2 ± 13.9%, low signal neointima in 7.3 ± 10.0%, and layered neointima in 2.7 ± 5.8%/stents. There was higher incidence of low signal neointima (10.5 ± 10.3% vs. 4.5 ± 5.6%, p = 0.003), neointimal thickness was larger (median: 106.8 μm, interquartile range: 79.3 to 130.4 μm vs. median: 83.5 μm, interquartile range: 62.3 to 89.3 μm; p < 0.0001), and neointimal coverage of stent struts was higher (92.1 ± 6.2% vs. 87.2 ± 11.9%; p = 0.03) in DM patients.

CONCLUSIONS

High signal neointimal pattern was predominantly observed, and low or layered signal pattern was observed in some cases. In DM patients, low signal neointima was observed with high frequency. Neointimal coverage and neointimal thickness was also higher in DM patients as compared with non-DM patients.

摘要

目的

我们通过光学相干断层扫描(OCT)研究了糖尿病(DM)患者与非糖尿病患者接受西罗莫司洗脱支架(SES)植入后的血管反应。

背景

DM 患者与非 DM 患者接受 SES 植入后的血管反应差异尚未通过 OCT 充分评估。

方法

对 63 例患者(32 例 DM,31 例非 DM)的 74 个非再狭窄 SES 植入术后 9 个月进行 OCT 检查。对于显示新生内膜覆盖的支架,测量每个支架节段内腔侧的新生内膜厚度,并将新生内膜特征分为高、低和分层信号模式。

结果

两组患者的基线特征、病变和操作特征数据相似。共分析了 11422 个支架。高信号新生内膜占 90.2%±13.9%,低信号新生内膜占 7.3%±10.0%,分层信号新生内膜占 2.7%±5.8%/支架。低信号新生内膜发生率较高(10.5%±10.3%比 4.5%±5.6%,p=0.003),新生内膜厚度较大(中位数:106.8μm,四分位间距:79.3 至 130.4μm 比中位数:83.5μm,四分位间距:62.3 至 89.3μm;p<0.0001),支架内新生内膜覆盖率较高(92.1%±6.2%比 87.2%±11.9%;p=0.03)。

结论

高信号新生内膜模式占主导地位,也有一些病例表现为低信号或分层信号模式。在 DM 患者中,低信号新生内膜发生率较高。与非 DM 患者相比,DM 患者的新生内膜覆盖率和新生内膜厚度也较高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验