Clinic for Cattle, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Bischofsholer Damm 15, D30173 Hannover, Germany.
Theriogenology. 2011 Feb;75(3):549-54. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.09.024. Epub 2010 Oct 20.
The objectives of this experiment were to characterize luteal blood flow in pregnant and non-pregnant cows and to determine its value for early pregnancy diagnosis. Lactating dairy cows (n = 54), 5.2 ± 0.2 y old (mean ± SEM), average parity 2.4 ± 0.2, and ≥ 6 wk postpartum at the start of the study, were used. The corpus luteum (CL) was examined with transrectal color Doppler ultrasonography (10.0-MHz linear-array transducer) on Days 3, 6, 9, 11, 13, 15, 18, and 21 of the estrus cycle (estrus = Day 0). Artificially inseminated cows (n = 40) were retrospectively classified as pregnant (embryonic heartbeat on Day 25; n = 18), nonpregnant (interestrus interval 15 to 21 d, n = 18), or having an apparent early embryonic loss (interestrus interval >25 d, n = 4). There was a group by time interaction (P < 0.001) for luteal blood flow from Days 3 to 18; it was approximately 1.10 ± 0.08 cm(2) (mean ± SEM) on Day 3, and increased to approximately 2.00 ± 0.08 cm(2) on Day 13 (similar among groups). Thereafter, luteal blood flow was numerically (albeit not significantly) greater in pregnant cows, remained constant in those with apparent embryonic loss, and declined (not significantly) between Days 15 and 18 in nonpregnant cows. Luteal blood flow was greater in pregnant than in nonpregnant (P < 0.05) and nonbred cows (P < 0.05, n = 14) on Day 15 (2.50 ± 0.16, 2.01 ± 0.16, and 2.00 ± 0.18 cm(2), respectively) and on Day 18 (2.40 ± 0.19, 1.45 ± 0.19, and 0.95 ± 0.21 cm(2)). In cows with apparent early embryonic loss, luteal blood flow was 2.00 ± 0.34 and 2.05 ± 0.39 cm(2) on Days 15 and 18, which was less (not significantly) than in pregnant cows, but greater (P < 0.05) than in nonbred cows on Day 18. Although mean luteal blood flow was significantly greater in pregnant than nonpregnant (and nonbred) cows on Days 15 and 18, due to substantial variation among cows, it was not an appropriate diagnostic tool for pregnancy status.
本实验的目的是描述妊娠和非妊娠奶牛的黄体血流,并确定其用于早期妊娠诊断的价值。使用了 54 头哺乳期奶牛(n = 54),年龄为 5.2 ± 0.2 岁(平均值 ± SEM),平均胎次为 2.4 ± 0.2,产后≥6 周,开始研究。在发情周期的第 3、6、9、11、13、15、18 和 21 天(发情 = 第 0 天),使用经直肠彩色多普勒超声(10.0-MHz 线性阵列换能器)检查黄体(CL)。人工授精的奶牛(n = 40)回顾性分为妊娠(第 25 天有胚胎心跳;n = 18)、非妊娠(发情间隔 15-21 天,n = 18)或早期胚胎丢失(发情间隔>25 天,n = 4)。从第 3 天到第 18 天,黄体血流存在组间时间交互作用(P < 0.001);第 3 天约为 1.10 ± 0.08 cm²(平均值 ± SEM),第 13 天增加到约 2.00 ± 0.08 cm²(各组之间相似)。此后,妊娠奶牛的黄体血流数值(尽管没有显著差异)较大,在有明显胚胎丢失的奶牛中保持不变,在非妊娠奶牛中在第 15 天和第 18 天之间下降(无显著差异)。第 15 天(2.50 ± 0.16、2.01 ± 0.16 和 2.00 ± 0.18 cm²)和第 18 天(2.40 ± 0.19、1.45 ± 0.19 和 0.95 ± 0.21 cm²),妊娠奶牛的黄体血流大于非妊娠(P < 0.05)和未配种奶牛(P < 0.05,n = 14)。在有明显早期胚胎丢失的奶牛中,第 15 天和第 18 天的黄体血流分别为 2.00 ± 0.34 和 2.05 ± 0.39 cm²,低于妊娠奶牛(无显著差异),但高于第 18 天的未配种奶牛(P < 0.05)。尽管第 15 天和第 18 天妊娠奶牛的黄体血流均值显著大于非妊娠(和未配种)奶牛,但由于奶牛之间存在很大差异,因此它不是一种合适的妊娠状态诊断工具。