• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[综述:重复性葡萄胎]

[Review: Repetitive hydatidiform moles].

作者信息

Muhlstein J, Golfier F, Frappart L, Poulizac G, Abel F, Touitou I, Hajri T, Raudrant D

机构信息

Pôle de gynécologie-obstétrique et reproduction, service de gynécologie, maternité régionale Adolphe-Pinard, 10, rue du Dr.-Heydenreich, CS 74213, 54042 Nancy cedex, France.

出版信息

Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2010 Nov;38(11):672-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2010.08.014. Epub 2010 Oct 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.gyobfe.2010.08.014
PMID:20965770
Abstract

Repetitive moles are rare. They are either sporadic or familial, with or without consanguinity. Some of them can be explained by a NLRP7 mutation, which causes genomic parental imprinting alteration, with a preferential paternal phenotypic expression. Currently, no effective therapeutic solution has been developed. Among the 1687 patients declared to the French Trophoblastic Disease Reference Center, 13 presented at least two hydatidiform moles, thus less than 1% of the patients. A mutation of the NLRP7 gene was shown in six of 12 tested patients (50%) among whom three presented a homozygous mutation and three a heterozygous mutation. For an affected patient, type of mole can indifferently be a complete hydatidiform mole or a partial hydatidiform mole. We describe these cases and compare them to those already published.

摘要

重复性葡萄胎较为罕见。它们可为散发性或家族性,有无近亲结婚情况均可出现。其中一些可由NLRP7突变来解释,该突变会导致基因组亲本印记改变,具有父系表型优先表达的特点。目前尚未开发出有效的治疗方案。在向法国滋养细胞疾病参考中心申报的1687例患者中,有13例至少出现过两次葡萄胎,因此占患者总数不到1%。在12例接受检测的患者中,有6例(50%)显示NLRP7基因突变,其中3例为纯合突变,3例为杂合突变。对于受影响的患者,葡萄胎类型可以是完全性葡萄胎或部分性葡萄胎。我们描述这些病例并将它们与已发表的病例进行比较。

相似文献

1
[Review: Repetitive hydatidiform moles].[综述:重复性葡萄胎]
Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2010 Nov;38(11):672-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2010.08.014. Epub 2010 Oct 20.
2
NLRP7 mutation analysis in sporadic hydatidiform moles in Tunisian patients: NLRP7 and sporadic mole.NLRP7 突变分析在突尼斯患者的散发性葡萄胎中:NLRP7 和散发性葡萄胎。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2012 Jun;136(6):646-51. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2011-0399-OA.
3
The spectrum of NLRP7 mutations in French patients with recurrent hydatidiform mole.法国复发性葡萄胎患者中 NLRP7 突变的频谱。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Aug;157(2):197-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.02.019. Epub 2011 Mar 25.
4
Screening for NLRP7 mutations in familial and sporadic recurrent hydatidiform moles: report of 2 Tunisian families.筛查家族性和散发性复发性葡萄胎中 NLRP7 突变:来自 2 个突尼斯家族的报告。
Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2011 Jul;30(4):348-53. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0b013e31820dc3b0.
5
[Family pedigree analysis in family member with history of hydatidiform mole and the NLRP7 gene expression].[有葡萄胎病史家庭成员的家系分析及NLRP7基因表达]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Aug;46(8):600-4.
6
Malignant potential of homozygous and heterozygous complete moles.纯合子和杂合子完全性葡萄胎的恶性潜能。
Cancer Res. 1984 Mar;44(3):1226-30.
7
The risk of post-molar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia is higher in heterozygous than in homozygous complete hydatidiform moles.杂合性完全性葡萄胎的滋养细胞肿瘤风险高于纯合性完全性葡萄胎。
Hum Reprod. 2010 May;25(5):1183-91. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq052. Epub 2010 Mar 5.
8
NLRP7 or KHDC3L genes and the etiology of molar pregnancies and recurrent miscarriage.NLRP7 或 KHDC3L 基因与葡萄胎和复发性流产的病因。
Mol Hum Reprod. 2013 Nov;19(11):773-81. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gat056. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
9
Histopathological features of biparental complete hydatidiform moles in women with NLRP7 mutations.具有 NLRP7 基因突变女性的二倍体完全性葡萄胎的组织病理学特征。
Placenta. 2013 Jan;34(1):50-6. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2012.11.005. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
10
The p.L750V mutation in the NLRP7 gene is frequent in Mexican patients with recurrent molar pregnancies and is not associated with recurrent pregnancy loss.NLRP7 基因中的 p.L750V 突变在墨西哥复发性葡萄胎患者中频繁发生,但与复发性妊娠丢失无关。
Prenat Diagn. 2013 Mar;33(3):205-8. doi: 10.1002/pd.4036. Epub 2013 Jan 28.