• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

椎间盘内电热疗法治疗椎间盘源性下腰痛的疗效

[Therapeutic effect of intradiscal electrothermal therapy for discogenic low back pain].

作者信息

Huang Qiao-dong, Wei Dai-gui, Zhao Guo-dong, Gao Chong-rong

机构信息

Department of Pain, Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical College, Guangzhou 510260, China.

出版信息

Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2010 Oct;30(10):2406-7, 2410.

PMID:20965858
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To observe the clinical efficacy and complications of intradiscal electrothermal therapy for treatment of discogenic low back pain.

METHODS

Forty patients with discogenic low back pain were treated with intradiscal electrothermal therapy, and the changes in the VAS, functional status and complications after the treatment were analyzed. RESULTS The VAS score was decreased and the functional status improved obviously after the treatment, which caused no severe complications.

CONCLUSION

Intradiscal electrothermal therapy is safe and effective to rapidly achieve pain relief and obviously improve the functional status of patients with discogenic low back pain with few complications.

摘要

目的

观察椎间盘内电热疗法治疗盘源性下腰痛的临床疗效及并发症。

方法

对40例盘源性下腰痛患者采用椎间盘内电热疗法进行治疗，并分析治疗后视觉模拟评分法（VAS）、功能状态及并发症的变化。结果：治疗后VAS评分降低，功能状态明显改善，未出现严重并发症。

结论

椎间盘内电热疗法安全有效，能迅速缓解疼痛，明显改善盘源性下腰痛患者的功能状态，且并发症较少。

相似文献

1
[Therapeutic effect of intradiscal electrothermal therapy for discogenic low back pain].椎间盘内电热疗法治疗椎间盘源性下腰痛的疗效
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2010 Oct;30(10):2406-7, 2410.
2
Treatment of discogenic low back pain with Intradiscal Electrothermal Therapy (IDET): 24 months follow-up in 50 consecutive patients.椎间盘源性下腰痛的椎间盘内电热疗法（IDET）治疗：50例连续患者的24个月随访
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2011;108:103-5. doi: 10.1007/978-3-211-99370-5_15.
3
Pain and function after intradiscal electrothermal treatment (IDET) for symptomatic lumbar disc degeneration.症状性腰椎间盘退变的椎间盘内电热疗法（IDET）后的疼痛与功能
Eur Spine J. 2002 Dec;11(6):589-93. doi: 10.1007/s00586-002-0450-6. Epub 2002 Aug 9.
4
Intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET) for chronic low back pain in active-duty soldiers: 2-year follow-up.现役军人慢性下腰痛的椎间盘内电热疗法（IDET）：2年随访
Spine J. 2003 Nov-Dec;3(6):502-9.
5
[Intradiscal interventional therapy for degenerative chronic discogenic low back pain with end-plate Modic changes].[终板Modic改变的退行性慢性椎间盘源性下腰痛的椎间盘内介入治疗]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2009 Sep 22;89(35):2490-4.
6
Intradiscal injection therapy for degenerative chronic discogenic low back pain with end plate Modic changes.经终板 Modic 改变的退行性慢性椎间盘源性下腰痛的椎间盘内注射治疗。
Spine J. 2011 Feb;11(2):100-6. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.07.001. Epub 2010 Sep 20.
7
Intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET) provides effective symptom relief in patients with discogenic low back pain.椎间盘内电热疗法（IDET）能有效缓解椎间盘源性下腰痛患者的症状。
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Feb;21(1):55-62. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31812f4f29.
8
A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial: intradiscal electrothermal therapy versus placebo for the treatment of chronic discogenic low back pain.一项随机、双盲、对照试验：椎间盘内电热疗法与安慰剂治疗慢性盘源性下腰痛的对比研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Jun 15;31(14):1636; author reply 1636-7. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000222124.71273.d9.
9
A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial: intradiscal electrothermal therapy versus placebo for the treatment of chronic discogenic low back pain.一项随机、双盲、对照试验：椎间盘内电热疗法与安慰剂治疗慢性盘源性下腰痛的对比研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Jun 15;31(14):1637-8; author reply 1638. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000222125.29001.a9.
10
A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial: intradiscal electrothermal therapy versus placebo for the treatment of chronic discogenic low back pain.一项随机、双盲、对照试验：椎间盘内电热疗法与安慰剂治疗慢性椎间盘源性下腰痛的对比研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Nov 1;30(21):2369-77; discussion 2378. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000186587.43373.f2.