Institute for Neuromusculoskeletal Research, Ohio University, United States.
J Neurosci Methods. 2011 Jan 15;194(2):329-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.10.012. Epub 2010 Oct 20.
Our understanding the neurophysiologic characteristics of the human paraspinal muscles has historically been hindered by the lack of experimental techniques to examine these muscles function in vivo. In this article we describe a paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) protocol to quantify intracortical facilitation (ICF) and short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) of the lumbar paraspinal muscles, and an electromechanical tapping protocol to measure the amplitude of the short-latency stretch reflex. Test-retest reliability of these protocols was examined across two sessions separated by 30-min in healthy adults. We assessed relative reliability by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and absolute reliability was assessed via coefficient of variation (CV). ICF and SICI in the lumbar paraspinal muscles exhibited the classical facilitatory and inhibitory responses observed in appendicular skeletal muscles (∼30% facilitation and inhibition, respectively). The motor evoked potential amplitude (MEP), ICF, SICI, and stretch reflex amplitude measurements did not significantly differ between the two testing sessions (p>0.05). The MEP amplitude, ICF and stretch reflex amplitude exhibited the highest relative and absolute reliability (ICC=0.89-0.91, CV=10.6-11.1%); whereas the SICI measure exhibited somewhat lower reliability (ICC=0.75, CV=20.1%). The stretch reflex protocol performed in the first testing session did not influence the TMS outcome measures in the second testing session (p>0.05). These innovative methods may be useful in studying basic physiology, the pathology of low back pain, as well as the mechanisms of action of treatment interventions.
我们对人类脊柱旁肌的神经生理特性的理解,历史上一直受到缺乏实验技术的限制,无法在体内检查这些肌肉的功能。在本文中,我们描述了一种成对脉冲经颅磁刺激(TMS)方案,用于量化腰椎脊柱旁肌的皮质内易化(ICF)和短间隔皮质内抑制(SICI),以及一种机电敲击方案,用于测量短潜伏期牵张反射的幅度。在健康成年人中,通过两个间隔 30 分钟的测试来检查这些方案的测试-再测试可靠性。我们通过计算组内相关系数(ICC)来评估相对可靠性,通过变异系数(CV)来评估绝对可靠性。腰椎脊柱旁肌的 ICF 和 SICI 表现出与四肢骨骼肌相似的经典易化和抑制反应(分别约为 30%的易化和抑制)。两个测试会话之间,运动诱发电位幅度(MEP)、ICF、SICI 和牵张反射幅度测量值没有显著差异(p>0.05)。MEP 幅度、ICF 和牵张反射幅度表现出最高的相对和绝对可靠性(ICC=0.89-0.91,CV=10.6-11.1%);而 SICI 测量值的可靠性略低(ICC=0.75,CV=20.1%)。在第一次测试中进行的牵张反射方案不会影响第二次测试中的 TMS 结果测量(p>0.05)。这些创新方法可能有助于研究基础生理学、腰痛的病理学以及治疗干预的作用机制。