Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
J Prosthet Dent. 2010 Nov;104(5):318-24. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60147-3.
In badly damaged teeth and teeth with short clinical crown heights, the placement of foundation restorations has been advocated to permit the development of retention and resistance form. However, there is little information on the effect of these foundation restorations on the clinical performance of the definitive restoration.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the load fatigue performance of teeth restored with posts and cores, with varying tooth heights, and to compare them with similar groups having no posts and cores. A secondary purpose was to determine whether a critical tooth height existed at which the placement of a foundation restoration resulted in no significant difference in the load fatigue performance.
Three test groups (n=10) with prepared tooth heights of 2, 3, and 4 mm were tested. These were compared with another 3 groups with similar tooth heights that were restored with prefabricated titanium posts and core heights of 4, 3, and 2 mm, respectively. Cast complete crowns were then fabricated and cemented with zinc phosphate cement. A fatigue load of 58.8 N was applied at an angle of 135 degrees to the long axis of each crown-tooth specimen. The number of cycles to preliminary failure was determined. Significant differences in cycles to preliminary failure were assessed with 1-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey HSD tests (α=.05).
The group with the greatest preparation height (4 mm) and a 2-mm post-retained foundation had the highest number of cycles to preliminary failure (437,701), while the group with the shortest preparation height and no foundation had the lowest number of cycles (53,806). The Tukey HSD multiple comparison tests showed that for all 3 tooth heights, groups with foundation restorations had a significantly higher number of cycles to preliminary failure than those without foundation restorations.
For a given tooth height, teeth restored with foundation restorations had a significantly better load fatigue performance than those with no foundation restoration.
在严重受损的牙齿和临床冠高度较短的牙齿中,提倡放置基础修复体以允许保留和阻力形式的发展。然而,关于这些基础修复体对最终修复体临床性能的影响的信息很少。
本研究的目的是评估具有不同牙高的用桩核修复的牙齿的负荷疲劳性能,并将其与具有相似牙高但无桩核的类似组进行比较。次要目的是确定是否存在临界牙高,在该牙高处,放置基础修复体不会导致负荷疲劳性能的显著差异。
测试了 3 个制备牙高分别为 2、3 和 4mm 的实验组(n=10)。然后将它们与另外 3 个具有相似牙高的组进行比较,这 3 个组分别用预制钛桩和核心高度为 4、3 和 2mm 进行修复。然后用磷酸锌水门汀制作铸造全冠并粘结。以 135 度角向每个冠-牙标本的长轴施加 58.8N 的疲劳载荷。确定初步失效的循环次数。用单向方差分析(ANOVA)评估初步失效循环数的显著差异,然后用 Tukey HSD 检验(α=0.05)进行检验。
具有最大制备高度(4mm)和 2mm 桩保留基础的组具有最高的初步失效循环数(437701),而具有最短制备高度和无基础的组具有最低的循环数(53806)。Tukey HSD 多重比较检验表明,对于所有 3 个牙高,具有基础修复体的组的初步失效循环数明显高于无基础修复体的组。
对于给定的牙高,用基础修复体修复的牙齿的负荷疲劳性能明显优于无基础修复体的牙齿。