Department of Radiology, National Institute for Cancer Research, Genova, Italy.
Skeletal Radiol. 2011 Jun;40(6):717-24. doi: 10.1007/s00256-010-1050-x. Epub 2010 Oct 23.
To compare 1.5-T and 3-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the brachial plexus.
Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained from 30 healthy volunteers and 30 consecutive patients with brachial plexus disturbances. MR was prospectively performed with comparable sequence parameters and coils with a 1.5-T and a 3-T system. Imaging protocols at both field strengths included T1-weighted turbo spin-echo (tSE) sequences and T2-weighed turbo spin-echo (tSE) sequences with fat saturation. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between muscle and nerve were calculated for both field strengths. The visibility of brachial plexus nerve at various anatomic levels (roots, interscalene area, costoclavicular space, and axillary level) was analyzed with a four-point grading scale by two radiologists. MR imaging diagnoses and pathological findings were also compared qualitatively.
SNR and CNRs were significantly higher on 3-T MR images than on 1.5-T MR images (Friedman test) for all sequences. Nerve visibility was significantly better on 3-T MR images than on 1.5-T MR images (paired sign test). Pathological findings (n = 30/30) were seen equally well with both field strengths. MR imaging diagnoses did not differ for the 1.5- and 3-T protocols.
High-quality MR images of the brachial plexus can be obtained with 3-T MR imaging by using sequences similar to those used at 1.5-T MR imaging. In patients and healthy volunteers, the visibility of nerve trunks and cords at 3-T MR imaging appears to be superior to that at 1.5-T MR imaging.
比较 1.5T 和 3T 磁共振(MR)成像在臂丛中的应用。
本研究经机构审查委员会批准并获得 30 名健康志愿者和 30 名连续臂丛神经病变患者的知情同意。使用具有可比性的序列参数和线圈,分别在 1.5T 和 3T 系统上进行前瞻性 MR 检查。两种场强的成像方案均包括 T1 加权涡轮自旋回波(tSE)序列和 T2 加权涡轮自旋回波(tSE)序列,均带有脂肪饱和。分别计算两种场强下肌肉与神经的信噪比(SNR)和对比噪声比(CNR)。由两位放射科医生采用四点分级评分法分析不同解剖水平(神经根、斜角肌间隙、肋锁间隙和腋窝水平)臂丛神经的显示情况。同时,对 MR 成像诊断和病理结果进行定性比较。
所有序列的 SNR 和 CNR 在 3T MR 图像上均显著高于 1.5T MR 图像(Friedman 检验)。3T MR 图像上神经的显示明显优于 1.5T MR 图像(配对符号检验)。两种场强均能很好地显示所有 30 例(30/30)的病理发现。两种场强的 MR 成像诊断结果无差异。
使用与 1.5T MR 成像相似的序列,3T MR 成像可获得高质量的臂丛神经图像。在患者和健康志愿者中,3T MR 成像上神经干和束的显示似乎优于 1.5T MR 成像。