Hampton Melvin C, Halkitis Perry N, Mattis Jacqueline S
Center for Health, Identity, Behavior, and Prevention Studies, Department of Applied Psychology, New York University, New York, USA.
AIDS Educ Prev. 2010 Oct;22(5):417-29. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2010.22.5.417.
Cross-sectional data were collected on a sample of 259 gay and bisexual, male-identified individuals as part of a larger study of the psychosocial functioning of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender persons. Analyses considered differences between HIV-positive and HIV-negative men in relation to active and religious coping strategies; avoidant coping strategies (specifically, illicit drug use); and the psychosocial states of anxiety, hostility, and depression in relation to self-reported HIV-status of the participants. As compared with HIV-negative men, the HIV positive participants indicated a greater likelihood of engaging in illicit substance use within the previous 3 months, as well as higher levels of both active and religious coping strategies. Illicit substance use also was found to be related to higher levels of depression, anxiety, and hostility. A multivariate model indicated a significant difference in substance-based and active coping strategies among the men surveyed, with persons with a self-reported HIV-positive serostatus endorsing higher levels of both strategies. These results and their implications for prevention and future research are discussed, rooted in the understanding that a complex reality for coping is often enacted by HIV-positive men.
作为一项关于女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别者心理社会功能的大型研究的一部分,收集了259名自我认同为男同性恋和双性恋男性的横断面数据。分析考虑了艾滋病毒阳性和阴性男性在积极应对策略和宗教应对策略、回避应对策略(具体而言,非法药物使用)以及与参与者自我报告的艾滋病毒感染状况相关的焦虑、敌意和抑郁等心理社会状态方面的差异。与艾滋病毒阴性男性相比,艾滋病毒阳性参与者表示在过去3个月内从事非法物质使用的可能性更大,以及积极应对策略和宗教应对策略的水平更高。还发现非法物质使用与更高水平的抑郁、焦虑和敌意有关。一个多变量模型表明,在接受调查的男性中,基于物质的应对策略和积极应对策略存在显著差异,自我报告为艾滋病毒阳性血清状态的人认可这两种策略的更高水平。本文讨论了这些结果及其对预防和未来研究的意义,其依据是认识到艾滋病毒阳性男性往往会面对复杂的应对现实。