Posner S F, Marks G
Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
Am J Prev Med. 1996 Nov-Dec;12(6):472-7.
This longitudinal study examined the prevalence and demographic correlates of unprotected insertive and receptive anal intercourse among HIV-positive gay and bisexual men who were aware of their serostatus.
Participants (n = 395), sampled randomly at two HIV outpatient clinics in Los Angeles, completed two waves of self-administered questionnaires (separated by approximately 7-9 months) that measured sexual behaviors in the previous 60 days.
The cross-sectional prevalence of unprotected insertive anal intercourse was 11.2% at time 1 and 7.1% at time 2. Longitudinal analysis indicated that nearly 15% of the participants had engaged in that high-risk behavior either at time 1 or time 2 and approximately 4% had engaged in the behavior at each time period. Similar rates of unprotected receptive anal intercourse were observed. These high-risk activities were more prevalent with seropositive and unknown serostatus partners than with seronegative partners. The rate of anal intercourse risk behaviors was higher among asymptomatic men and among those who were exclusively gay.
The findings demonstrate considerable differences in the prevalence of stable and occasional high-risk sexual behaviors among HIV-positive gay and bisexual men. Simple cross-sectional analyses cannot capture the stability or variation in behavior across time and, thus, may generate misleading conclusions about disease transmission, especially if the partner's HIV serostatus is not considered in the analysis. The findings indicate a need for focused safer-sex interventions for seropositive men. The HIV outpatient clinic is an ideal setting for such interventions.
这项纵向研究调查了知晓自身血清学状态的HIV阳性男同性恋者和双性恋者中无保护插入式和接受式肛交的流行情况及其人口统计学相关因素。
在洛杉矶的两家HIV门诊随机抽取395名参与者,他们完成了两波自填式问卷调查(间隔约7 - 9个月),问卷测量了前60天内的性行为。
无保护插入式肛交的横断面流行率在第1次调查时为11.2%,在第2次调查时为7.1%。纵向分析表明,近15%的参与者在第1次或第2次调查时曾有过这种高危行为,约4%的参与者在每个时间段都有过该行为。无保护接受式肛交的发生率与之相似。这些高危行为在血清学阳性和血清学状态未知的性伴中比在血清学阴性的性伴中更为普遍。无症状男性以及仅为男同性恋的人群中肛交危险行为的发生率更高。
研究结果表明,HIV阳性男同性恋者和双性恋者中稳定和偶尔的高危性行为流行率存在显著差异。简单的横断面分析无法捕捉行为随时间的稳定性或变化情况,因此,可能会得出关于疾病传播的误导性结论,特别是在分析中未考虑性伴的HIV血清学状态时。研究结果表明需要针对血清学阳性男性开展有针对性的安全性行为干预措施。HIV门诊是开展此类干预的理想场所。