Department of Urology, Vardhman Mahaveer Medical College and Safdarjang Hospital, New Delhi, India.
J Endourol. 2010 Dec;24(12):2059-66. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0066. Epub 2010 Oct 25.
The role of early/emergency shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) in symptomatic upper ureteral calculi has still not been established. We have performed a randomized comparison between early (<48 hours) vs delayed (>48 hours) SWL for symptomatic upper ureteral stones less than 1 cm to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of early SWL in these patients.
One hundred and sixty consecutive patients with a single radiopaque upper ureteral stone <1 cm, who presented with an episode of colicky pain and who were undergoing treatment between July 2008 and June 2009 in our department were included. The patients were hospitalized and randomized into two groups-group A: SWL was performed within 48 hours of onset of colicky pain (early SWL) using the electromagnetic lithotripter (Dornier Alpha Compact) along with analgesics and hydration therapy; group B: SWL was performed after 48 hours (delayed SWL) along with analgesics and hydration therapy. The statistical analysis was performed in two groups regarding the patient demographic profile, presence of hydronephrosis, time to stone clearance, success rates, number of sessions needed, auxiliary procedures, modified efficiency quotient (EQ), and complications.
Eighty patients were enrolled in each group. The mean stone size was 7.3 mm in group A vs 7.5 mm in group B (P = 0.52). The stone fragmentation rate was 88.75% in group A vs 91.2% in group B (P = 0.35). The overall 3-month stone-free rate was 86.3% (69/80) for group A vs 76.2% (61/80) for group B (P = 0.34). The mean time taken for stone clearance was significantly less in group A than in group B (10.2 days vs 21.1 days; P = 0.01). The number of sessions needed in group A were significantly less than in group B (1.3 vs 2.7; P = 0.01). The auxiliary procedure rate was also significantly lesser in group A than group B (16.3% vs 32.5%; P = 0.001). The modified EQ (in %) was 67.2 in group A vs 59.4 in group B (P = 0.21). The steinstrasse formation and requirement for percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) were significantly less in group A (P:0.02 and P:0.01 respectively).
Early SWL (within 48 hours of onset of colicky pain) is feasible, safe, and highly efficacious in the management of symptomatic proximal ureteral stones <1 cm, resulting in a lesser requirement of number of SWL sessions, time taken for stone clearance, auxiliary procedure rate, and fewer complications in comparison with delayed SWL.
对于有症状的上段输尿管结石,早期/急诊冲击波碎石术(SWL)的作用仍未确定。我们对小于 1cm 的有症状上段输尿管结石患者进行了早期(<48 小时)与延迟(>48 小时)SWL 的随机比较,以评估早期 SWL 在这些患者中的可行性、安全性和疗效。
2008 年 7 月至 2009 年 6 月期间,我们科室收治了 160 例有单个不透射线的上段输尿管结石<1cm、出现绞痛发作且正在接受治疗的连续患者。将患者住院并随机分为两组:A 组:在绞痛发作后 48 小时内(早期 SWL)使用电磁碎石机(Dornier Alpha Compact)进行碎石术,同时进行止痛和补液治疗;B 组:在 48 小时后(延迟 SWL)进行碎石术,同时进行止痛和补液治疗。对两组患者的人口统计学特征、肾积水情况、结石清除时间、成功率、所需碎石次数、辅助治疗、改良效率指数(EQ)和并发症进行统计学分析。
每组有 80 例患者。A 组的平均结石大小为 7.3mm,B 组为 7.5mm(P=0.52)。A 组的结石碎裂率为 88.75%,B 组为 91.2%(P=0.35)。A 组的 3 个月结石清除率为 86.3%(69/80),B 组为 76.2%(61/80)(P=0.34)。A 组的结石清除时间明显短于 B 组(10.2 天 vs 21.1 天;P=0.01)。A 组所需碎石次数明显少于 B 组(1.3 次 vs 2.7 次;P=0.01)。A 组的辅助治疗率也明显低于 B 组(16.3% vs 32.5%;P=0.001)。A 组改良 EQ(%)为 67.2%,B 组为 59.4%(P=0.21)。A 组石街形成和需要经皮肾造口术(PCN)的发生率明显低于 B 组(P:0.02 和 P:0.01)。
早期 SWL(绞痛发作后 48 小时内)在处理<1cm 的有症状上段输尿管结石时是可行、安全和高效的,与延迟 SWL 相比,它需要更少的碎石次数、结石清除时间、辅助治疗率和并发症。