Suppr超能文献

Ⅱ类 1 分类错(牙合)伴前牙创伤中覆(牙合)增加的诊断性能。

Diagnostic performance of increased overjet in Class II division 1 malocclusion and incisor trauma.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, The University of Florence, Italy.

出版信息

Prog Orthod. 2010;11(2):145-50. doi: 10.1016/j.pio.2010.09.003.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study were: 1) to evaluate the associations between an increased overjet (IO) and other dentoskeletal characteristics of Class II division 1 malocclusions in the mixed dentition; 2) to assess whether Class II division 1 malocclusions or rather an increased overjet per se is a risk factor for upper incisor trauma (UIT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A sample of 900 mixed dentition subjects, was observed by clinical inspection, analysis of dental casts, and lateral cephalograms. The diagnostic performance of IO (overjet ≥ 7 mm) was evaluated in relation to other Class II dentoskeletal features (Class II molar and canine relationships, and skeletal Class II relationships). Secondly, the diagnostic performance of IO and of the other Class II dentoskeletal components was tested with regard to the prevalence of UIT. Diagnostic performance was assessed by odds ratio and positive likelihood ratio.

RESULTS

The diagnostic performance of IO with regard to the other dentoskeletal components of Class II malocclusions was not significant. The only Class II features associated significantly with an increased risk of UIT was IO.

CONCLUSIONS

When used as an isolated occlusal feature, IO is not a valid diagnostic indicator for Class II division 1 malocclusions. An increased overjet per se, and not Class II malocclusions, appears to be a significant risk factor for UIT. These findings recommend discrimination between clinical conditions showing an isolated IO from comprehensive Class II malocclusions during diagnosis, analysis of treatment outcomes, and evaluation of the risk of upper incisor trauma.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是:1)评估混合牙列中安氏Ⅱ类 1 分类错[牙合]中,高覆[牙合](IO)与其他牙颌面特征的相关性;2)评估安氏Ⅱ类 1 分类错[牙合],还是高覆[牙合]本身,是上颌切牙外伤(UIT)的危险因素。

材料和方法

通过临床检查、牙模分析和头颅侧位片观察了 900 名混合牙列患者。评估 IO(覆[牙合]≥7mm)与其他 II 类牙颌面特征(II 类磨牙和尖牙关系、骨骼 II 类关系)之间的相关性。其次,评估 IO 和其他 II 类牙颌面成分在 UIT 患病率方面的诊断性能。通过比值比和阳性似然比评估诊断性能。

结果

IO 与 II 类错[牙合]的其他牙颌面成分的诊断性能无显著差异。与 UIT 风险增加显著相关的唯一 II 类特征是 IO。

结论

当作为孤立的咬合特征使用时,IO 不是安氏Ⅱ类 1 分类错[牙合]的有效诊断指标。高覆[牙合]本身,而不是 II 类错[牙合],似乎是 UIT 的一个重要危险因素。这些发现建议在诊断、治疗效果分析和 UIT 风险评估中,区分表现为孤立 IO 的临床情况与全面的 II 类错[牙合]。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验