Suppr超能文献

各专业医生的薪酬:为医生报销辩论提供信息。

Physician wages across specialties: informing the physician reimbursement debate.

作者信息

Leigh J Paul, Tancredi Daniel, Jerant Anthony, Kravitz Richard L

机构信息

Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis School of Medicine, USA.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 2010 Oct 25;170(19):1728-34. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.350.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Disparities in remuneration between primary care and other physician specialties may impede health care reform by undermining the sustainability of a primary care workforce. Previous studies have compared annual incomes across specialties unadjusted for work hours. Wage (earnings-per-hour) comparisons could better inform the physician payment debate.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional analysis of data from 6381 physicians providing patient care in the 2004-2005 Community Tracking Study (adjusted response rate, 53%), we compared wages across broad and narrow categories of physician specialties. Tobit and linear regressions were run. Four broad specialty categories (primary care, surgery, internal medicine and pediatric subspecialties, and other) and 41 specific specialties were analyzed together with demographic, geographic, and market variables.

RESULTS

In adjusted analyses on broad categories, wages for surgery, internal medicine and pediatric subspecialties, and other specialties were 48%, 36%, and 45% higher, respectively, than for primary care specialties. In adjusted analyses for 41 specific specialties, wages were significantly lower for the following than for the reference group of general surgery (wage near median, $85.98): internal medicine and pediatrics combined (-$24.36), internal medicine (-$24.27), family medicine (-$23.70), and other pediatric subspecialties (-$23.44). Wage rankings were largely impervious to adjustment for control variables, including age, race, sex, and region.

CONCLUSIONS

Wages varied substantially across physician specialties and were lowest for primary care specialties. The primary care wage gap was likely conservative owing to exclusion of radiologists, anesthesiologists, and pathologists. In light of low and declining medical student interest in primary care, these findings suggest the need for payment reform aimed at increasing incomes or reducing work hours for primary care physicians.

摘要

背景

初级保健与其他医师专业之间的薪酬差距可能会破坏初级保健劳动力的可持续性,从而阻碍医疗改革。以往的研究比较了各专业未经工作时长调整的年收入。工资(每小时收入)比较能为医师薪酬辩论提供更有用的信息。

方法

在对2004 - 2005年社区追踪研究中提供患者护理的6381名医师的数据进行横断面分析(调整后的回应率为53%)时,我们比较了宽泛和细分的医师专业类别之间的工资。进行了托比特回归和线性回归分析。将四个宽泛的专业类别(初级保健、外科、内科和儿科亚专业以及其他)和41个具体专业与人口统计学、地理和市场变量一起进行分析。

结果

在对宽泛类别的调整分析中,外科、内科和儿科亚专业以及其他专业的工资分别比初级保健专业高48%、36%和45%。在对41个具体专业的调整分析中,以下专业的工资显著低于普通外科参考组(工资接近中位数,85.98美元):内科和儿科合并专业(-24.36美元)、内科(-24.27美元)、家庭医学(-23.70美元)以及其他儿科亚专业(-23.44美元)。工资排名在很大程度上不受年龄、种族、性别和地区等控制变量调整影响。

结论

医师各专业之间工资差异很大,初级保健专业工资最低。由于排除了放射科医生、麻醉科医生和病理科医生,初级保健工资差距可能较为保守。鉴于医学生对初级保健的兴趣较低且呈下降趋势,这些发现表明需要进行薪酬改革,以提高初级保健医生的收入或减少其工作时长。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验