Maus Timothy
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2010 Nov;21(4):725-66. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2010.07.004.
Imaging is an integral part of the clinical examination of the patient with back pain; it is, however, often used excessively and without consideration of the underlying literature. The primary role of imaging is the identification of systemic disease as a cause of the back or limb pain; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) excels at this. Systemic disease as a cause of back or limb pain is, however, rare. Most back and radiating limb pain is of benign nature, owing to degenerative phenomena. There is no role for imaging in the initial evaluation of the patient with back pain in the absence of signs or symptoms of systemic disease. When conservative care fails, imaging may be undertaken with due consideration of its risks: labeling the patient as suffering from a degenerative disease, cost, radiation exposure, and provoking unwarranted minimally invasive or surgical intervention. Imaging can well depict disc degeneration and disc herniation. Imaging can suggest the presence of discogenic pain, but the lack of a pathoanatomic gold standard obviates any definitive conclusions. The imaging natural history of disc herniation is resolution. There is very poor correlation between imaging findings of disc herniation and the clinical presentation or course. Psychosocial factors predict functional disability due to disc herniation better than imaging. Imaging with MRI, computed tomography (CT), or CT myelography can readily identify central canal, lateral recess, or foraminal compromise. Only when an imaging finding is concordant with the patient's pain pattern or neurologic deficit can causation be considered. The zygapophysial (facet) and sacroiliac joint are thought to be responsible for axial back pain, although with less frequency than the disc. Imaging findings of the structural changes of osteoarthritis do not correlate with pain production. Physiologic imaging, either with single-photon emission CT bone scan, heavily T2-weighted MRI sequences (short-tau inversion recovery), or gadolinium enhancement, can detect inflammation and are more predictive of an axial pain generator.
影像学检查是背痛患者临床检查不可或缺的一部分;然而,其使用往往过度且未考虑相关文献。影像学检查的主要作用是识别作为背痛或肢体疼痛病因的全身性疾病;磁共振成像(MRI)在这方面表现出色。然而,作为背痛或肢体疼痛病因的全身性疾病很少见。大多数背痛和放射性肢体疼痛是良性的,由退行性病变引起。在没有全身性疾病体征或症状的背痛患者的初始评估中,影像学检查并无作用。当保守治疗失败时,进行影像学检查时应适当考虑其风险:将患者诊断为患有退行性疾病、费用、辐射暴露以及引发不必要的微创或手术干预。影像学检查能够很好地显示椎间盘退变和椎间盘突出。影像学检查可以提示椎间盘源性疼痛的存在,但由于缺乏病理解剖学金标准,无法得出任何确定性结论。椎间盘突出的影像学自然病程是自行缓解。椎间盘突出的影像学表现与临床表现或病程之间的相关性很差。社会心理因素比影像学检查更能预测因椎间盘突出导致的功能障碍。使用MRI、计算机断层扫描(CT)或CT脊髓造影进行影像学检查可以很容易地识别中央管、侧隐窝或椎间孔受压情况。只有当影像学检查结果与患者的疼痛模式或神经功能缺损一致时,才可以考虑因果关系。关节突(小关节)和骶髂关节被认为是导致轴性背痛的原因,尽管其发生率低于椎间盘。骨关节炎结构改变的影像学表现与疼痛产生无关。生理性影像学检查,无论是单光子发射CT骨扫描、重T2加权MRI序列(短反转恢复序列)还是钆增强检查,都可以检测炎症,并且更能预测轴性疼痛的根源。