Zhang Xiu-zhen, Song Li-ge, Wang Bo, Yang Jun, Li Hong, Xuan Miao, Lei Tao, Guo Xiao-hui, Lü Xiao-feng, Xue Qing-yun, Yang Gang-yi, Ji Qiu-he, Shen Jie, Liu Zhi-min, Li Cheng-jiang, Wu Tian-feng, Xie Hai-bao, Tong Jiu-cui
Department of Endocrinology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200065, China.
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2010 Aug;49(8):662-6.
To compare the clinical efficacy and safety between recombinant human parathyroid hormone (rhPTH) (1-34) and elcatonin in the treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in China.
This 6 month, multicenter, randomized and controlled study enrolled 205 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. They were randomized to receive either rhPTH (1-34) 20 µg (200 U) daily or elcatonin 20 U weekly. Lumbar spine (L1-4) and femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) and biochemical markers of bone turnover were measured. In the meantime adverse events were recorded.
The results showed that both rhPTH (1-34) and elcatonin increased L1-4 BMD significantly at the endpoint of the study, but femoral neck BMD did not change significantly. From baseline to endpoint, BMD of L1-4 and femoral neck in the rhPTH (1-34) group increased by 5.51% (P<0.01) and 0.65% (P>0.05), but BMD of L1-4 and femoral neck in elcatonin group increased by 1.55% (P<0.05) and 0.11% (P>0.05). Moreover, the rhPTH (1-34) group had better improvement in L1-4 BMD than the elcatonin group at 3, 6 months, but there was no difference of BMD in these two groups with regard to femoral neck. There were greater mean increases of the bone markers in the rhPTH (1-34) group than those in the elcatonin group at 3, 6 months [serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP) 36.79% vs 0.31%; 92.42% vs -0.17%; the ratio of urine N-telopeptide of type I collagen and creatinine (NTX/Cr) 48.91% vs -5.32%; 68.82% vs -10.86%]. Both kinds of treatment were well tolerated and there were no differences between the two groups in the rates of adverse events and serious adverse events.
It is concluded that rhPTH (1-34) has more positive effects on bone formation than elcatonin as shown by the greater increments of L1-4 BMD and bone formation markers and the less occurrence of adverse events as well as no significant change in hepatic, renal or hemopoietic function.
比较重组人甲状旁腺激素(rhPTH)(1-34)与依降钙素在中国绝经后骨质疏松症女性患者中的临床疗效及安全性。
本为期6个月的多中心随机对照研究纳入了205例绝经后骨质疏松症女性患者。她们被随机分为两组,分别每日接受20μg(200U)的rhPTH(1-34)或每周接受20U的依降钙素治疗。测量腰椎(L1-4)和股骨颈的骨密度(BMD)以及骨转换的生化指标。同时记录不良事件。
结果显示,在研究终点时,rhPTH(1-34)和依降钙素均使L1-4的BMD显著增加,但股骨颈BMD无显著变化。从基线到终点,rhPTH(1-34)组L1-4和股骨颈的BMD分别增加了5.51%(P<0.01)和0.65%(P>0.05),而依降钙素组L1-4和股骨颈的BMD分别增加了1.55%(P<0.05)和0.11%(P>0.05)。此外,在3个月和6个月时,rhPTH(1-34)组L1-4的BMD改善情况优于依降钙素组,但两组在股骨颈BMD方面无差异。在3个月和6个月时,rhPTH(1-34)组骨标志物的平均增加幅度大于依降钙素组[血清骨特异性碱性磷酸酶(BSAP)分别为36.79%对0.31%;92.42%对-0.17%;尿I型胶原N-端肽与肌酐比值(NTX/Cr)分别为48.91%对-5.32%;68.82%对-10.86%]。两种治疗耐受性均良好,两组在不良事件和严重不良事件发生率方面无差异。
结论是,rhPTH(1-34)对骨形成的积极作用大于依降钙素,表现为L1-4 BMD和骨形成标志物增加幅度更大、不良事件发生率更低,且肝、肾或造血功能无显著变化。