Suppr超能文献

比较在法国巴黎巴斯德研究所旅行诊所咨询的人道主义援助工作者和其他旅行者对旅行相关健康风险及其预防的了解。

Comparison of knowledge on travel related health risks and their prevention among humanitarian aid workers and other travellers consulting at the Institut Pasteur travel clinic in Paris, France.

机构信息

Institut Pasteur, Centre Médical, Centre d'Infectiologie Necker Pasteur, Consultation de Pathologie Infectieuse, Tropicale et de Médecine des voyages, 211 rue de Vaugirard, 75724 Paris, Cedex 15, France.

出版信息

Travel Med Infect Dis. 2010 Nov;8(6):364-72. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2010.09.005. Epub 2010 Oct 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) workers are a group of travellers highly exposed to infectious diseases due to the conditions and duration of their stay. Yet little is known about their knowledge concerning travel related health risks and their prevention.

METHODS

From July to September 2008 a self-administered questionnaire was given to all NGO workers coming for pre-travel consultation and to a comparison group of non-NGO travellers. It examined traveller's knowledge about malaria, traveller's diarrhea, transmission routes of infectious diseases and vaccine availability in both groups.

RESULTS

249 NGO employees and 304 non-NGO travellers were surveyed. Mean age (33.7 vs 34.7 years) and sex ratio (M/F 1.16 vs 1.29) were comparable in both groups. Travel destination was more often Africa (75% vs 39%) and duration of travel was longer in the NGO group (75% vs 15% more than 1 month). NGO travellers had significantly better knowledge about the transmission routes of infectious diseases : percentages of accurate answers varied from 20% for Japanese encephalitis, 31% for yellow fever and 41% for hepatitis A to 70% for dengue and 96% for malaria, versus respectively 9%, 17%, 40%, 54% and 94% for the comparison group. However no differences were observed between the two groups concerning the means to prevent malaria or traveller's diarrhea, or the symptoms necessitating medical consultation. In the sub-group analyses medical professionals (23% of the NGO group) performed better than other NGO workers.

CONCLUSIONS

Even though the knowledge was slightly better in the NGO group, there are still important gaps and a combined effort of all actors is needed to improve the security of expatriated humanitarian aid workers, in particular for the non-medical staff.

摘要

背景

由于工作条件和工作期限的原因,非政府组织(NGO)工作者是一群高度暴露于传染病的旅行者。然而,对于他们的旅行相关健康风险及其预防知识知之甚少。

方法

2008 年 7 月至 9 月,对所有前来进行旅行前咨询的 NGO 工作者和非 NGO 旅行者的比较组进行了自我管理的问卷调查。它调查了两组旅行者对疟疾、旅行者腹泻、传染病传播途径和疫苗供应的了解。

结果

共调查了 249 名 NGO 员工和 304 名非 NGO 旅行者。两组的平均年龄(33.7 岁对 34.7 岁)和性别比(M/F 1.16 对 1.29)相似。旅行目的地更常见于非洲(75%对 39%),NGO 组的旅行时间更长(75%比 15%的人超过 1 个月)。NGO 旅行者对传染病传播途径的了解明显更好:正确答案的百分比从乙型脑炎的 20%、黄热病的 31%和甲型肝炎的 41%到登革热的 70%和疟疾的 96%,而对照组分别为 9%、17%、40%、54%和 94%。然而,两组在预防疟疾或旅行者腹泻的方法或需要医疗咨询的症状方面没有差异。在亚组分析中,医学专业人员(NGO 组的 23%)的表现优于其他 NGO 工作人员。

结论

尽管 NGO 组的知识略好,但仍存在重要差距,需要所有行为者共同努力,以提高人道主义援助人员的安全性,特别是对非医务人员而言。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验