Czigler I, Csibra G
Institute for Psychology of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest.
Psychophysiology. 1990 Nov;27(6):669-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1990.tb03191.x.
Event-related potential effects of deviant stimuli were investigated in a visual discrimination task. The stimuli (two angles within a frame) were either frequent (Standard) or one of two types of infrequent deviant (Deviant 1 or Deviant 2) stimuli. In comparison to the Standard stimuli, for Deviant 1 the two angles differed in their orientation, whereas for Deviant 2 the angles were identical but the frame was thicker. In Condition 1 the subjects counted the number of Deviant 1 stimuli. Of the 13 subjects, 12 did not detect the fact that some of the frames were thicker in this condition (i.e., for the Deviant 2 stimuli in Condition 2). The task in Condition 2 was the same (i.e., the target was Deviant 1), but the subjects were instructed about the thicker frame of Deviant 2 stimuli. In Condition 3, Deviant 2 stimuli became the targets. In comparison to the Standard, Deviant 1 elicited two posterior negative waves in the 120-180 and 240-300 ms latency ranges respectively. In addition, when Deviant 1 was the target stimulus (Conditions 1 and 2), this stimulus elicited the N2 and the P300 as well. In contrast, the irrelevant Deviant 2 elicited no such waves. In the target position (Condition 3), Deviant 2 elicited the second posterior negativity, the N2 and the late positivity. The earlier negativity is considered to be a correlate of processes connected to the automatic detection of the deviant features, whereas the later negativity is considered to be related to attentive processes, i.e., this wave is considered to be a member of the family of processing negativities.
在一项视觉辨别任务中,研究了异常刺激的事件相关电位效应。刺激物(框架内的两个角度)要么是频繁出现的(标准刺激),要么是两种类型的不频繁出现的异常刺激(异常刺激1或异常刺激2)之一。与标准刺激相比,对于异常刺激1,两个角度的方向不同,而对于异常刺激2,角度相同但框架更厚。在条件1中,受试者计算异常刺激1的数量。在13名受试者中,有12名没有察觉到在这种情况下有些框架更厚(即,对于条件2中的异常刺激2)。条件2中的任务相同(即,目标是异常刺激1),但告知受试者异常刺激2的框架更厚。在条件3中,异常刺激2成为目标。与标准刺激相比,异常刺激1分别在120 - 180毫秒和240 - 300毫秒的潜伏期范围内引发了两个后部负波。此外,当异常刺激1是目标刺激时(条件1和条件2),这种刺激还引发了N2和P300。相比之下,不相关的异常刺激2没有引发此类波。在目标位置(条件3),异常刺激2引发了第二个后部负波、N2和晚期正波。较早的负波被认为与与异常特征的自动检测相关的过程有关,而较晚的负波被认为与注意力过程有关,即,这个波被认为是加工负波家族的一员。