• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

质疑语境:一组跨学科问题,用于调查影响健康决策的语境因素。

Questioning context: a set of interdisciplinary questions for investigating contextual factors affecting health decision making.

机构信息

Health Care, Technology and Place CIHR Strategic Training Program, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2011 Jun;14(2):115-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00618.x. Epub 2010 Oct 28.

DOI:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00618.x
PMID:21029277
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5060568/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To combine insights from multiple disciplines into a set of questions that can be used to investigate contextual factors affecting health decision making.

BACKGROUND

Decision-making processes and outcomes may be shaped by a range of non-medical or 'contextual' factors particular to an individual including social, economic, political, geographical and institutional conditions. Research concerning contextual factors occurs across many disciplines and theoretical domains, but few conceptual tools have attempted to integrate and translate this wide-ranging research for health decision-making purposes.

METHODS

To formulate this tool we employed an iterative, collaborative process of scenario development and question generation. Five hypothetical health decision-making scenarios (preventative, screening, curative, supportive and palliative) were developed and used to generate a set of exploratory questions that aim to highlight potential contextual factors across a range of health decisions.

FINDINGS

We present an exploratory tool consisting of questions organized into four thematic domains - Bodies, Technologies, Place and Work (BTPW) - articulating wide-ranging contextual factors relevant to health decision making. The BTPW tool encompasses health-related scholarship and research from a range of disciplines pertinent to health decision making, and identifies concrete points of intersection between its four thematic domains. Examples of the practical application of the questions are also provided.

CONCLUSIONS

These exploratory questions provide an interdisciplinary toolkit for identifying the complex contextual factors affecting decision making. The set of questions comprised by the BTPW tool may be applied wholly or partially in the context of clinical practice, policy development and health-related research.

摘要

目的

将多个学科的见解结合起来,形成一组可用于研究影响健康决策的情境因素的问题。

背景

决策过程和结果可能受到一系列特定于个体的非医学或“情境”因素的影响,包括社会、经济、政治、地理和制度条件。涉及情境因素的研究涉及许多学科和理论领域,但很少有概念工具试图为健康决策目的整合和翻译这广泛的研究。

方法

为了制定这个工具,我们采用了一种迭代的、协作的情景开发和问题生成过程。开发了五个假设的健康决策情景(预防性、筛查性、治疗性、支持性和姑息性),并使用这些情景生成了一组探索性问题,旨在突出一系列健康决策中的潜在情境因素。

结果

我们提出了一个由问题组成的探索性工具,这些问题组织成四个主题领域 - 身体、技术、地点和工作(BTPW) - 阐明了与健康决策相关的广泛情境因素。BTPW 工具包含了与健康决策相关的来自多个学科的学术研究,确定了其四个主题领域之间的具体交叉点。还提供了问题实际应用的示例。

结论

这些探索性问题为确定影响决策的复杂情境因素提供了一个跨学科的工具包。BTPW 工具中的问题集可以在临床实践、政策制定和健康相关研究的背景下全部或部分应用。

相似文献

1
Questioning context: a set of interdisciplinary questions for investigating contextual factors affecting health decision making.质疑语境:一组跨学科问题,用于调查影响健康决策的语境因素。
Health Expect. 2011 Jun;14(2):115-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00618.x. Epub 2010 Oct 28.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Provincial prenatal record revision: a multiple case study of evidence-based decision-making at the population-policy level.省级产前记录修订:基于证据的人口政策层面决策的多案例研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Dec 19;8:266. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-266.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
How does context influence collaborative decision-making for health services planning, delivery and evaluation?背景如何影响卫生服务规划、提供和评估中的协作决策?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Nov 19;14:545. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0545-x.
6
Patient-Oriented Research Competencies in Health (PORCH) for patients, healthcare providers, decision-makers and researchers: protocol of a scoping review.面向患者、医疗保健提供者、决策者和研究人员的健康患者导向研究能力(PORCH):系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 19;7(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0762-1.
7
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
8
Factors affecting engagement between academic faculty and decision-makers: learnings and priorities for a school of public health.影响学术教师与决策者参与的因素:公共卫生学院的经验教训和优先事项。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Jul 25;16(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0342-9.
9
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
10
The G8 Heart Health Projects Database: testing the compatibility of an Internet-based resource with health promotion planning processes.八国集团心脏健康项目数据库:测试基于互联网的资源与健康促进规划流程的兼容性。
Health Promot Pract. 2003 Oct;4(4):413-21. doi: 10.1177/1524839903255469.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a decision support tool in pediatric Differences/Disorders of Sex Development.儿科性发育差异/障碍决策支持工具的开发
Semin Pediatr Surg. 2019 Oct;28(5):150838. doi: 10.1016/j.sempedsurg.2019.150838. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
2
Indirect effects of contextual factors on patients' consultations with healthcare professionals about health information found online.情境因素对患者就网上获取的健康信息与医疗保健专业人员进行咨询的间接影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 30;16(1):447. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1713-y.
3
Shared decision making in designing new healthcare environments-time to begin improving quality.设计新的医疗环境中的共同决策——是时候开始提高质量了。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Mar 21;15:114. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0782-7.
4
Philosophy, health services and research.哲学、卫生服务与研究。
Health Expect. 2011 Jun;14(2):113-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00696.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Sociological interpretations of professionalism.社会学视角下的专业性解读。
Med Educ. 2009 Sep;43(9):829-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03408.x. Epub 2009 Aug 6.
2
We need minimally disruptive medicine.我们需要微创医学。
BMJ. 2009 Aug 11;339:b2803. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2803.
3
HIV prevention for Black women: structural barriers and opportunities.黑人女性的艾滋病预防:结构性障碍与机遇
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2008 Aug;19(3):829-41. doi: 10.1353/hpu.0.0043.
4
The next step in guideline development: incorporating patient preferences.指南制定的下一步:纳入患者偏好。
JAMA. 2008 Jul 23;300(4):436-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.4.436.
5
Beyond shared decision making: an expanded typology of medical decisions.超越共同决策:医学决策的扩展类型学
Med Decis Making. 2008 Sep-Oct;28(5):699-705. doi: 10.1177/0272989X08318465. Epub 2008 Jun 12.
6
Public engagement on global health challenges.公众对全球卫生挑战的参与。
BMC Public Health. 2008 May 20;8:168. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-168.
7
Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 3. Discipline, inter-discipline distance, and selection of discipline.卫生研究、服务、教育及政策中的多学科性、跨学科性和超学科性:3. 学科、学科间距离与学科选择
Clin Invest Med. 2008;31(1):E41-8. doi: 10.25011/cim.v31i1.3140.
8
YouTube as a source of information on immunization: a content analysis.YouTube作为免疫接种信息来源的内容分析
JAMA. 2007 Dec 5;298(21):2482-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.21.2482.
9
Patient complexity: more than comorbidity. the vector model of complexity.患者复杂性:不止于共病。复杂性的向量模型。
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Dec;22 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):382-90. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0307-0.
10
Personality and health care decision-making style.个性与医疗保健决策风格。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2007 Sep;62(5):P261-7. doi: 10.1093/geronb/62.5.p261.