Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Japan.
Am J Cardiol. 2010 Nov 1;106(9):1307-12. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.06.059.
Negative inotropic agents are often administered to decrease the left ventricular (LV) pressure gradient in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC). Little information is available regarding comparisons of the effects on LV pressure gradient among negative inotropic agents. The present study compared the decrease in the LV pressure gradient at rest in patients with obstructive HC after treatment with pilsicainide versus treatment with disopyramide or cibenzoline. The LV pressure gradient and LV function were assessed before and after the intravenous administration of each drug. In 12 patients (group A, mean pressure gradient 90 ± 24 mm Hg), the effects of disopyramide, propranolol, and verapamil were compared. In another 12 patients (group B, mean pressure gradient 98 ± 34 mm Hg), a comparison was performed among disopyramide, cibenzoline, and pilsicainide. In group A, the percentage of reduction in the LV pressure gradient was 7.7 ± 9.9% with verapamil, 19.0 ± 20.2% with propranolol, and 58.6 ± 15.0% with disopyramide, suggesting that disopyramide was more effective than either verapamil or propranolol. In group B, the percentage of reduction in the LV pressure gradient was 55.3 ± 26.6% with disopyramide, 55.3 ± 20.6% with cibenzoline, and 54.7 ± 15.4% with pilsicainide, suggesting an equivalent effect on the LV pressure gradient for these 3 agents. In conclusion, these results indicate that the acute efficacy for the reduction of the LV pressure gradient at rest by pilsicainide (a pure sodium channel blocker) was equivalent to that of disopyramide or cibenzoline (combined sodium and calcium channel blockers). Accordingly, sodium channel blockade might be more important for reducing the LV pressure gradient at rest in patients with obstructive HC than calcium channel blockade or β blockade.
负性肌力药物常用于降低梗阻性肥厚型心肌病(HC)患者的左心室(LV)压力梯度。关于负性肌力药物对 LV 压力梯度影响的比较,相关信息较少。本研究比较了匹西卡尼与双异丙吡胺或西苯唑啉治疗梗阻性 HC 患者后 LV 压力梯度的降低情况。在静脉注射每种药物前后评估 LV 压力梯度和 LV 功能。在 12 名患者(A 组,平均压力梯度 90 ± 24mmHg)中,比较了双异丙吡胺、普萘洛尔和维拉帕米的作用。在另外 12 名患者(B 组,平均压力梯度 98 ± 34mmHg)中,比较了双异丙吡胺、西苯唑啉和匹西卡尼的作用。在 A 组中,维拉帕米使 LV 压力梯度降低 7.7 ± 9.9%,普萘洛尔降低 19.0 ± 20.2%,双异丙吡胺降低 58.6 ± 15.0%,表明双异丙吡胺比维拉帕米或普萘洛尔更有效。在 B 组中,双异丙吡胺使 LV 压力梯度降低 55.3 ± 26.6%,西苯唑啉降低 55.3 ± 20.6%,匹西卡尼降低 54.7 ± 15.4%,表明这 3 种药物对 LV 压力梯度的影响相当。总之,这些结果表明,匹西卡尼(一种纯钠通道阻滞剂)在降低静息时 LV 压力梯度方面的急性疗效与双异丙吡胺或西苯唑啉(钠钙通道阻滞剂联合使用)相当。因此,钠通道阻断可能比钙通道阻断或β阻断更重要,对于降低梗阻性 HC 患者的静息时 LV 压力梯度。