Niall K K, Macnamara J
Defence and Civil Institute of Environmental Medicine, Human Factors Division, North York, Ontario, Canada.
Perception. 1990;19(5):637-60. doi: 10.1068/p190637.
Four experiments test the assumption that, in the visual perception of pictures, observers have reliable and direct access to the equivalence of shapes in projective geometry. The assumption is that perception of projective equivalence is the basis of shape constancy ('the projective thesis'). Observers matched or reproduced abstract planar shapes under conditions of rotation in the picture plane, and pictured rotation in depth. Departure from projective equivalence was assessed in each study by measuring the planar analogue of cross ratio. Projective equivalence was not found to be perceived uniformly where Euclidean equivalence was not judged uniformly, either in recognition tasks or in production tasks. When the projective thesis is put to a suitably general test, confidence in the thesis is undermined.
在对图片的视觉感知中,观察者能够可靠且直接地获取射影几何中形状的等价性。该假设认为,射影等价性的感知是形状恒常性的基础(“射影论点”)。观察者在图片平面内旋转以及深度旋转的条件下匹配或复制抽象平面形状。在每项研究中,通过测量交比的平面类似物来评估与射影等价性的偏离。无论是在识别任务还是在生成任务中,当欧几里得等价性未被一致判断时,射影等价性也未被一致感知。当对射影论点进行适当的一般性检验时,对该论点的信心受到了削弱。