Wagemans J, Lamote C, Van Gool L
Department of Psychology, University of Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium,
Psychon Bull Rev. 1997 Jun;4(2):248-53. doi: 10.3758/BF03209401.
When a planar shape is viewed obliquely, it is deformed by a perspective deformation. If the visual system were to pick up geometrical invariants from such projections, these would necessarily be invariant under the wider class of projective transformations. To what extent can the visual system tell the difference between perspective and nonperspective but still projective deformations of shapes? To investigate this, observers were asked to indicate which of two test patterns most resembled a standard pattern. The test patterns were related to the standard pattern by a perspective or projective transformation, or they were completely unrelated. Performance was slightly better in a matching task with perspective and unrelated test patterns (92.6%) than in a projective-random matching task (88.8%). In a direct comparison, participants had a small preference (58.5%) for the perspectively related patterns over the projectively related ones. Preferences were based on the values of the transformation parameters (slant and shear). Hence, perspective and projective transformations yielded perceptual differences, but they were not treated in a categorically different manner by the human visual system.
当一个平面形状被斜着观看时,它会因透视变形而发生形变。如果视觉系统要从这样的投影中提取几何不变量,那么这些不变量必然在更广泛的射影变换类别下保持不变。视觉系统在多大程度上能够区分形状的透视变形和非透视但仍然是射影的变形呢?为了研究这一点,要求观察者指出两个测试图案中哪一个与标准图案最相似。测试图案通过透视或射影变换与标准图案相关,或者它们完全不相关。在透视和不相关测试图案的匹配任务中(92.6%),表现略优于射影-随机匹配任务(88.8%)。在直接比较中,参与者对透视相关图案的偏好略高于射影相关图案(58.5%)。偏好是基于变换参数(倾斜和剪切)的值。因此,透视和射影变换产生了感知差异,但人类视觉系统对它们的处理方式并没有绝对的不同。