Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, 84108, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2010 Dec;38(12):2435-42. doi: 10.1177/0363546510382835. Epub 2010 Oct 28.
Double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs were developed to improve initial biomechanical strength of repairs to improve healing rates. Despite biomechanical improvements, failure of healing remains a clinical problem.
To evaluate the anatomical results after double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with ultrasound to determine postoperative repair integrity and the effect of various factors on tendon healing.
Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
Forty-eight patients (49 shoulders) who had a complete arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (double-row technique) were evaluated with ultrasound at a minimum of 6 months after surgery. Outcome was evaluated at a minimum of 1-year follow-up with standardized history and physical examination, visual analog scale for pain, active forward elevation, and preoperative and postoperative shoulder scores according to the system of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and the Simple Shoulder Test. Quantitative strength was measured postoperatively.
Ultrasound and physical examinations were performed at a minimum of 6 months after surgery (mean, 16 months; range, 6 to 36 months) and outcome questionnaire evaluations at a minimum of 12 months after surgery (mean, 29 months; range, 12 to 55 months). Of 49 repairs, 25 (51%) were healed. Healing rates were 67% in single-tendon tears (16 of 24 shoulders) and 36% in multitendon tears (9 of 25 shoulders). Older age and longer duration of follow-up were correlated with poorer tendon healing (P < .03). Visual analog scale for pain, active forward elevation, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, and Simple Shoulder Test scores all had significant improvement from baseline after repair (P < .0001).
Increased age and longer duration of follow-up were associated with lower healing rates after double-row rotator cuff repair. The biological limitation at the repair site, as reflected by the effects of age on healing, appears to be the most important factor influencing tendon healing, even after maximizing repair biomechanical strength with a double-row construct.
双排关节镜肩袖修复旨在提高修复的初始生物力学强度,以提高愈合率。尽管生物力学得到了改善,但愈合失败仍然是一个临床问题。
使用超声评估双排关节镜肩袖修复后的解剖结果,以确定术后修复的完整性以及各种因素对肌腱愈合的影响。
病例系列;证据水平,4 级。
对 48 例(49 肩)接受完整关节镜肩袖修复(双排技术)的患者进行超声评估,术后至少 6 个月进行。至少在 1 年的随访时进行结果评估,包括标准化的病史和体格检查、疼痛视觉模拟评分、主动前向抬高、术前和术后美国肩肘外科医师系统和简单肩测试评分。术后测量定量力量。
超声和体格检查均在术后至少 6 个月(平均 16 个月;范围,6 至 36 个月)进行,术后至少 12 个月(平均 29 个月;范围,12 至 55 个月)进行结果问卷评估。在 49 例修复中,有 25 例(51%)愈合。单肌腱撕裂(24 肩中的 16 肩)的愈合率为 67%,多肌腱撕裂(25 肩中的 9 肩)的愈合率为 36%。年龄较大和随访时间较长与肌腱愈合不良相关(P <.03)。修复后,疼痛视觉模拟评分、主动前向抬高、美国肩肘外科医师评分和简单肩测试评分均从基线显著改善(P <.0001)。
双排肩袖修复后,年龄增加和随访时间延长与愈合率降低相关。修复部位的生物学限制,如年龄对愈合的影响,似乎是影响肌腱愈合的最重要因素,即使使用双排结构最大限度地提高修复的生物力学强度也是如此。