Lafosse Laurent, Brzoska Roman, Toussaint Bruno, Gobezie Reuben
Alps Surgery Institute, Clinique Generale, Annecy, France.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Oct;90 Suppl 2 Pt 2:275-86. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00388.
The reported rate of failure after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair has varied widely. The influence of the repair technique on the failure rates and functional outcomes after open or arthroscopic rotator cuff repair remains controversial. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the functional and anatomic results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs performed with the double-row suture anchor technique on the basis of computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging arthrography in order to determine the postoperative integrity of the repairs.
A prospective series of 105 consecutive shoulders undergoing arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair of the supraspinatus or a combination of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus were evaluated at a minimum of two years after surgery. The evaluation included a routine history and physical examination as well as determination of the preoperative and postoperative strength, pain, range of motion, and Constant scores. All shoulders had a preoperative and postoperative computed tomography arthrogram (103 shoulders) or magnetic resonance imaging arthrogram (two shoulders).
There were thirty-six small rotator cuff tears, forty-seven large isolated supraspinatus or combined supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendon tears, and twenty-two massive rotator cuff tears. The mean Constant score (and standard deviation) was 43.2 +/- 15.1 points (range, 8 to 83 points) preoperatively and 80.1 +/- 11.1 points (range, 46 to 100 points) postoperatively. Twelve of the 105 repairs failed. Intact rotator cuff repairs were associated with significantly increased strength and active range of motion.
Arthroscopic repair of a rotator cuff tear with use of the double-row suture anchor technique results in a much lower rate of failure than has previously been reported in association with either open or arthroscopic repair methods. Patients with an intact rotator cuff repair have better pain relief than those with a failed repair. After repair, large and massive rotator cuff tears result in more postoperative weakness than small tears do.
关节镜下肩袖修复术后报道的失败率差异很大。开放或关节镜下肩袖修复技术对失败率和功能结果的影响仍存在争议。本研究的目的是基于计算机断层扫描或磁共振成像关节造影评估采用双排缝线锚钉技术进行关节镜下肩袖修复的功能和解剖学结果,以确定修复术后的完整性。
对连续105例接受关节镜下双排肩袖修复术治疗的肩峰下或肩峰下与冈下肌联合损伤的患者进行前瞻性研究,术后至少随访两年。评估包括常规病史和体格检查,以及术前和术后的力量、疼痛、活动范围和Constant评分。所有患者术前和术后均进行了计算机断层扫描关节造影(103例)或磁共振成像关节造影(2例)。
有36例小肩袖撕裂、47例大的孤立性肩峰下或肩峰下与冈下肌联合肌腱撕裂以及22例巨大肩袖撕裂。术前Constant评分(及标准差)平均为43.2±15.1分(范围8至83分),术后为80.1±11.1分(范围46至100分)。105例修复中有12例失败。完整的肩袖修复与力量和主动活动范围的显著增加相关。
采用双排缝线锚钉技术进行关节镜下肩袖撕裂修复的失败率比以前报道的开放或关节镜修复方法要低得多。肩袖修复完整的患者比修复失败的患者疼痛缓解更好。修复后,大的和巨大的肩袖撕裂比小撕裂导致更多的术后无力。