Gheorghe Liana, Baculea Simona
Center of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Fundeni Clinical Institute of Digestive Diseases & Liver Transplantation, Fundeni street, 253 Bucharest, Romania.
Hepatogastroenterology. 2010 Jul-Aug;57(101):939-44.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Pegylated interferons (Peg-IFNs) with ribavirin represent the standard treatment in chronic C viral hepatitis in Romania. Primary aim was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Peg-IFN alpha-2a plus ribavirin versus IFN alpha-2b plus ribavirin in genotype-1 patients in Romanian setting. The second end point was to make an indirect comparison of the cost-effectiveness of combination therapy of the two Peg-IFNs.
Published clinical data on sustained virological response rates (SVR) and early virological response rates (EVR) from more recent published studies were used for both combination therapies. A Markov model with seven health states was built. The reference patient was a 45-year-old male with chronic non-cirrhotic liver disease due to chronic HCV infection. Time horizon is patient lifetime. Published data on the natural history of hepatitis C, local mortality data, published utilities and local expertise were used for assessment of local procedures, resources used and costs. The perspective is that of the National Health Insurance Agency (NHIA).
The incremental cost of treatment with Peg-IFN alpha-2a plus ribavirin is 19,056 Rol per LY gained and 27,175 Rol per QALY gained. A one-way sensitivity analysis showed that results are sensitive to the discount rate used, but they still are highly cost-effective. The indirect comparison of cost-effectiveness of Peg-IFNs combination therapies over IFN alpha-2b showed superiority of Peg-IFN alpha-2a and ribavirin therapy.
This study demonstrates a higher cost-effectiveness of the current state-of-the art treatment with Peg-IFN alpha-2a with ribavirin over the standard IFN and ribavirin combination. Although a slight superiority of Peg-IFN alpha-2a over Peg-IFN alpha-2b combined regimen was shown in Romanian setting in terms of LYs and QALYs gained, there are no significant differences in cost-effectiveness of the two therapies.
背景/目的:聚乙二醇化干扰素(Peg-IFNs)联合利巴韦林是罗马尼亚慢性丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染的标准治疗方案。主要目的是评估在罗马尼亚背景下,聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a联合利巴韦林与干扰素α-2b联合利巴韦林治疗基因1型患者的成本效益。第二个终点是对两种聚乙二醇化干扰素联合治疗的成本效益进行间接比较。
两种联合治疗均使用了近期发表研究中公布的持续病毒学应答率(SVR)和早期病毒学应答率(EVR)的临床数据。构建了一个具有七种健康状态的马尔可夫模型。参考患者为一名45岁男性,因慢性HCV感染患有慢性非肝硬化肝病。时间范围为患者的一生。使用丙型肝炎自然史的已发表数据、当地死亡率数据、已发表的效用值和当地专业知识来评估当地的治疗程序、使用的资源和成本。视角为国家健康保险机构(NHIA)。
聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a联合利巴韦林治疗的增量成本为每获得一个生命年(LY)增加19,056罗马尼亚列伊(ROL),每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)增加27,175 ROL。单向敏感性分析表明,结果对所使用的贴现率敏感,但仍具有高度成本效益。聚乙二醇化干扰素联合治疗与干扰素α-2b的成本效益间接比较显示,聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a联合利巴韦林治疗更具优势。
本研究表明,目前聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a联合利巴韦林的先进治疗方案比标准干扰素联合利巴韦林方案具有更高的成本效益。尽管在罗马尼亚背景下,就获得的生命年和质量调整生命年而言,聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a略优于聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2b联合治疗方案,但两种治疗方案的成本效益没有显著差异。