• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a联合利巴韦林与干扰素α-2b联合利巴韦林作为初治慢性丙型肝炎初始治疗的成本效益

Cost effectiveness of peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin versus interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin as initial therapy for treatment-naive chronic hepatitis C.

作者信息

Sullivan Sean D, Craxi Antonio, Alberti Alfredo, Giuliani Giovanni, De Carli Claudio, Wintfeld Neil, Patel Kavita K, Green Jesse

机构信息

University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(4):257-65. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422040-00004.

DOI:10.2165/00019053-200422040-00004
PMID:14974875
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In adults with previously untreated chronic hepatitis C (CHC), the combination of peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin produces a higher rate of sustained virological response (SVR) than interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin, but it is still unproven whether this increase is cost effective. The objective of this study was to determine if the gain in SVR with peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin is worth the incremental cost.

METHODS

We constructed a Markov model of disease progression in which cohorts of patients received peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin or interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin for 48 weeks (hepatitis C virus [HCV] genotype 1 and non-1 patients with fibrosis) or 24 weeks (genotype non-1 patients without fibrosis), and were followed for their expected lifetimes. The reference patient was a 45-year-old male with CHC without cirrhosis. The SVRs with peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin and interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin used to populate the model were 46% and 36% for patients infected with HCV genotype 1 and 76% and 61% for patients infected with HCV non-1 genotypes, respectively. QOL and costs for each health state were based on literature estimates and on Italian treatment patterns. Costs were in 2002 euros and benefits were discounted at 3%. Sensitivity analyses on key clinical and economic parameters were performed. The analysis was reported from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service.

RESULTS

In patients infected with HCV genotype 1, peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin increased life-years (LYs) by 0.78 years and QALYs by 0.67 years, compared with interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin. The incremental cost per LY and QALY gained was euro9433 and euro10 894, respectively. In patients infected with HCV non-1 genotypes, peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin increased LYs by 1.17 and QALY by 1.01 years, compared with interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin. The incremental cost per LY and QALY gained was euro3261 and euro3766, respectively. Using genotype distribution estimates, the weighted average ICER for all genotypes was euro6811 per LY gained and euro7865 per QALY gained.

CONCLUSION

Our model suggests that peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin is cost effective compared with conventional interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin for treatment of naive adults with CHC, regardless of HCV genotype, under a wide range of assumptions regarding treatment effectiveness and costs.

摘要

引言

在既往未经治疗的慢性丙型肝炎(CHC)成人患者中,聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a联合利巴韦林比干扰素α-2b联合利巴韦林产生更高的持续病毒学应答(SVR)率,但这种增加是否具有成本效益仍未得到证实。本研究的目的是确定聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a联合利巴韦林在SVR方面的获益是否值得其增加的成本。

方法

我们构建了一个疾病进展的马尔可夫模型,其中患者队列接受聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a联合利巴韦林或干扰素α-2b联合利巴韦林治疗48周(丙型肝炎病毒[HCV]基因型1及有纤维化的非1型患者)或24周(无纤维化的非1型基因型患者),并随访其预期寿命。参考患者为一名45岁无肝硬化的CHC男性。用于填充模型的聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a联合利巴韦林和干扰素α-2b联合利巴韦林的SVR,HCV基因型1感染患者分别为46%和36%,HCV非1基因型感染患者分别为76%和61%。每个健康状态的生活质量(QOL)和成本基于文献估计和意大利的治疗模式。成本以2002年欧元计,效益按3%贴现。对关键临床和经济参数进行了敏感性分析。该分析从意大利国家卫生服务的角度进行报告。

结果

与干扰素α-2b联合利巴韦林相比,聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a联合利巴韦林使HCV基因型1感染患者的生命年(LYs)增加0.78年,质量调整生命年(QALYs)增加0.67年。每获得1个LY和1个QALY的增量成本分别为9433欧元和10894欧元。与干扰素α-2b联合利巴韦林相比,聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a联合利巴韦林使HCV非1基因型感染患者的LYs增加1.17年,QALY增加1.01年。每获得1个LY和1个QALY的增量成本分别为3261欧元和3766欧元。使用基因型分布估计,所有基因型的加权平均增量成本效果比(ICER)为每获得1个LY6811欧元,每获得1个QALY7865欧元。

结论

我们的模型表明相对于传统的干扰素α-2b联合利巴韦林,聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a联合利巴韦林治疗初治的CHC成人患者具有成本效益,无论HCV基因型如何,在关于治疗有效性和成本的广泛假设下均如此。

相似文献

1
Cost effectiveness of peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin versus interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin as initial therapy for treatment-naive chronic hepatitis C.聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a联合利巴韦林与干扰素α-2b联合利巴韦林作为初治慢性丙型肝炎初始治疗的成本效益
Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(4):257-65. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422040-00004.
2
Cost-effectiveness of combination peginterferon alpha-2a and ribavirin compared with interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C.聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a与利巴韦林联合用药对比干扰素α-2b与利巴韦林治疗慢性丙型肝炎患者的成本效益分析
Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Aug;99(8):1490-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.30286.x.
3
Peginterferon alfa-2a versus peginterferon alfa-2b as initial treatment of hepatitis C virus infection: a cost-utility analysis from the perspective of the Veterans Affairs Health Care System.聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2b作为丙型肝炎病毒感染初始治疗的比较:基于退伍军人事务医疗保健系统视角的成本效用分析
Pharmacotherapy. 2007 Jun;27(6):813-24. doi: 10.1592/phco.27.6.813.
4
Peginterferon alfa and ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C in patients eligible for shortened treatment, re-treatment or in HCV/HIV co-infection: a systematic review and economic evaluation.聚乙二醇干扰素 α 和利巴韦林治疗适合缩短疗程、再治疗或合并 HCV/HIV 感染的慢性丙型肝炎患者:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Apr;15(17):i-xii, 1-210. doi: 10.3310/hta15170.
5
Pharmacoeconomic analysis of the treatment of chronic hepatitis C with peginterferon alfa-2a or peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin in Spain.聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a或聚乙二醇干扰素α-2b联合利巴韦林治疗西班牙慢性丙型肝炎的药物经济学分析
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Nov;36(9):555-64. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2013.08.003. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
6
Pegylated interferon alpha-2a and -2b in combination with ribavirin in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C: a systematic review and economic evaluation.聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a和α-2b联合利巴韦林治疗慢性丙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Oct;8(39):iii-iv, 1-125. doi: 10.3310/hta8390.
7
Cost-effectiveness of peginterferon alfa-2a (40kDa) plus ribavirin in patients with HIV and hepatitis C virus co-infection.聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a(40kDa)联合利巴韦林治疗HIV与丙型肝炎病毒合并感染患者的成本效益分析
J Clin Virol. 2006 Aug;36(4):283-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2006.04.008. Epub 2006 Jun 9.
8
Economic evaluation of pegylated interferon plus ribavirin for treatment of chronic hepatitis C in Thailand: genotype 1 and 6.聚乙二醇干扰素联合利巴韦林治疗泰国慢性丙型肝炎1型和6型的经济学评价
BMC Gastroenterol. 2016 Aug 5;16(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12876-016-0506-4.
9
Cost-effectiveness of peginterferon alpha-2a and peginterferon alpha-2b combination regimens in genotype-1 naive patients with chronic hepatitis C.聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2b联合治疗方案对初治基因1型慢性丙型肝炎患者的成本效益分析
Hepatogastroenterology. 2010 Jul-Aug;57(101):939-44.
10
Cost-efficacy analysis of peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin compared with peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C.聚乙二醇干扰素α-2b联合利巴韦林与聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a联合利巴韦林治疗慢性丙型肝炎的成本效益分析
J Manag Care Pharm. 2005 Oct;11(8):687-94. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2005.11.8.687.

引用本文的文献

1
Allocating treatment resources for hepatitis C in the UK: a constrained optimization modelling approach.英国丙型肝炎治疗资源的分配:一种约束优化建模方法。
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2021 Mar 25;9(1):1887664. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2021.1887664.
2
Systematic Review of Health State Utility Values Used in European Pharmacoeconomic Evaluations for Chronic Hepatitis C: Impact on Cost-Effectiveness Results.系统评价在欧洲慢性丙型肝炎药物经济学评价中使用的健康状态效用值:对成本效益结果的影响。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2021 Jan;19(1):29-44. doi: 10.1007/s40258-020-00600-w.
3
Cost-Utility of All-Oral Direct-Acting Antiviral Regimens for the Treatment of Genotype 1 Chronic Hepatitis C Virus-Infected Patients in Hong Kong.

本文引用的文献

1
Peginterferon-alpha2a and ribavirin combination therapy in chronic hepatitis C: a randomized study of treatment duration and ribavirin dose.聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a与利巴韦林联合治疗慢性丙型肝炎:治疗疗程和利巴韦林剂量的随机研究
Ann Intern Med. 2004 Mar 2;140(5):346-55. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-140-5-200403020-00010.
2
Etiology, natural history and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.肝细胞癌的病因、自然史及治疗
Antiviral Res. 2003 Oct;60(2):145-50. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2003.08.010.
3
Cost-effectiveness of treatment for chronic hepatitis C infection in an evolving patient population.
香港基因 1 型慢性丙型肝炎病毒感染患者全口服直接抗病毒治疗方案的成本-效用分析。
Dig Dis Sci. 2021 Apr;66(4):1315-1326. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06281-8. Epub 2020 May 8.
4
Patient preferences in Italy: health state utilities associated with attributes of weekly injection devices for treatment of type 2 diabetes.意大利患者的偏好:与2型糖尿病每周注射装置属性相关的健康状态效用值
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Jun 6;12:971-979. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S159620. eCollection 2018.
5
Economic evaluation of Zepatier for the management of HCV in the Italian scenario.泽必泰用于意大利 HCV 管理的经济学评价。
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Dec;19(9):1365-1374. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-0980-4. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
6
Optimizing choice of oral interferon-free treatment for genotype 1 hepatitis C virus using testing for NS5A resistance: a cost-utility analysis from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service.利用NS5A耐药性检测优化1型丙型肝炎病毒无干扰素口服治疗方案的选择:意大利国家医疗服务体系视角下的成本效用分析
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2017 Feb 27;9:163-172. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S117650. eCollection 2017.
7
The cost-effectiveness of testing for NS5a resistance-associated polymorphisms at baseline in genotype 1a-infected (treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced) subjects treated with all-oral elbasvir/grazoprevir regimens in the United States.在美国,对接受全口服艾尔巴韦/格拉瑞韦治疗方案的1a基因型感染(初治和经治)受试者在基线时检测NS5a耐药相关多态性的成本效益。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Feb;45(3):455-467. doi: 10.1111/apt.13882. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
8
Real-world effectiveness of peginterferon α-2b plus ribavirin in a Canadian cohort of treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis C patients with genotypes 2 or 3: results of the PoWer and RediPEN studies.聚乙二醇干扰素α-2b联合利巴韦林在加拿大初治基因2型或3型慢性丙型肝炎患者队列中的真实世界疗效:PoWer和RediPEN研究结果
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016 Apr;35(4):597-609. doi: 10.1007/s10096-016-2576-1. Epub 2016 Feb 6.
9
Ending the mass criminalisation of people who use drugs: a necessary component of the public health response to hepatitis C.终结对吸毒者的大规模定罪:这是应对丙型肝炎公共卫生措施的必要组成部分。
BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-S6-S4. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
10
Peginterferon plus ribavirin versus interferon plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C.聚乙二醇干扰素联合利巴韦林与干扰素联合利巴韦林治疗慢性丙型肝炎的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 28;2014(2):CD005441. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005441.pub3.
不断变化的患者群体中慢性丙型肝炎感染治疗的成本效益
JAMA. 2003 Jul 9;290(2):228-37. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.2.228.
4
Cost effectiveness of peginterferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin versus interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin for initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C.聚乙二醇干扰素α-2b联合利巴韦林与干扰素α-2b联合利巴韦林用于初治慢性丙型肝炎的成本效益分析
Gut. 2003 Mar;52(3):425-32. doi: 10.1136/gut.52.3.425.
5
Introduction to therapy of hepatitis C.丙型肝炎治疗介绍
Hepatology. 2002 Nov;36(5 Suppl 1):S114-20. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2002.36226.
6
Peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus infection.聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a联合利巴韦林治疗慢性丙型肝炎病毒感染
N Engl J Med. 2002 Sep 26;347(13):975-82. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020047.
7
Cost effectiveness of combination therapy for hepatitis C: a decision analytic model.丙型肝炎联合治疗的成本效益:一种决策分析模型。
Gut. 2002 Feb;50(2):253-8. doi: 10.1136/gut.50.2.253.
8
Estimating progression to cirrhosis in chronic hepatitis C virus infection.评估慢性丙型肝炎病毒感染患者进展为肝硬化的情况。
Hepatology. 2001 Oct;34(4 Pt 1):809-16. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2001.27831.
9
Peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin compared with interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C: a randomised trial.聚乙二醇干扰素α-2b联合利巴韦林与干扰素α-2b联合利巴韦林用于初治慢性丙型肝炎的比较:一项随机试验
Lancet. 2001 Sep 22;358(9286):958-65. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(01)06102-5.
10
Cost-effectiveness of interferon alfa-2b with and without ribavirin as therapy for chronic hepatitis C in Sweden.在瑞典,使用和不使用利巴韦林的干扰素α-2b治疗慢性丙型肝炎的成本效益。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2001 Aug;36(8):870-6. doi: 10.1080/003655201750313414.