McGarry M B, Franz P, Den Hartog D J, Goetz J A
Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA.
Rev Sci Instrum. 2010 Oct;81(10):10E516. doi: 10.1063/1.3481167.
A soft x-ray (SXR) diagnostic to measure electron temperature on the Madison Symmetric Torus using two complementary methods is presented. Both methods are based on the double-foil technique, which calculates electron temperature via the ratio of SXR bremsstrahlung emission from the plasma in two different energy ranges. The tomographic emissivity method applies the double-foil technique to a tomographic reconstruction of SXR emissivity, creating a two-dimensional map of temperature throughout the plasma. In contrast, the direct brightness method applies the double-foil technique directly to the measured brightness and generates vertical and horizontal radial profiles. Extensive modeling demonstrates advantages and limitations in both techniques. For example, although the emissivity technique provides a two-dimensional mapping of temperature, its reliance on multiple tomographic inversions introduces some artifacts into the results. On the other hand, the more direct brightness technique avoids these artifacts but is only able to provide a radial profile of electron temperature.
本文介绍了一种用于在麦迪逊对称环面(Madison Symmetric Torus)上测量电子温度的软X射线(SXR)诊断方法,该方法采用了两种互补的方式。这两种方式均基于双箔技术,该技术通过等离子体在两个不同能量范围内的SXR轫致辐射发射率之比来计算电子温度。层析发射率方法将双箔技术应用于SXR发射率的层析重建,从而创建整个等离子体的二维温度图。相比之下,直接亮度方法则将双箔技术直接应用于测量的亮度,并生成垂直和水平径向分布。大量建模展示了这两种技术的优点和局限性。例如,尽管发射率技术提供了温度的二维映射,但其对多次层析反演的依赖会在结果中引入一些伪影。另一方面,更直接的亮度技术避免了这些伪影,但只能提供电子温度的径向分布。