• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食管胃交界部黏膜内腺癌的内镜黏膜下剥离术:长期疗效。

Superficial adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: long-term results of endoscopic submucosal dissection.

机构信息

Gastroenterological Center and Department of Pathology, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Minami-ku, Yokohama, Japan.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Nov;72(5):960-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.07.030.

DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2010.07.030
PMID:21034897
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was recently introduced as a treatment option for superficial adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ); however, its long-term clinical outcomes have not been fully evaluated.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the long-term outcomes of ESD for patients with superficial adenocarcinoma of the EGJ.

DESIGN

Retrospective review from a single institution.

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENTS

Fifty-eight patients, 46 men and 12 women (mean 69.3 years), with 39 T1m and 19 T1sm adenocarcinomas of the EGJ treated from June 2000 to May 2009.

INTERVENTIONS

ESD procedures were performed with typical sequences.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Complications, en bloc resection rate, curative resection rate, local recurrence, and distant metastases after ESD were evaluated. Curative resection is histologically defined as being free of resection margins and any evidence of deep submucosal invasion, undifferentiated carcinoma, and lymphovascular invasion.

RESULTS

There were no major complications except for 3 patients with ulcer bleeding without the need for blood transfusion and 1 patient with esophageal stenosis. The rates of en bloc resection and curative resection were 100% and 79%, respectively. Twelve resections were histologically considered noncurative; these patients underwent additional ESD (n = 1) or surgical resection (n = 8). Local or distant recurrences were not observed in any patient achieving curative resection during follow-up (median 36.6 months, range 4-94 months).

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective design and single-site data collection.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term outcomes after ESD are favorable. ESD may be adopted as a treatment of choice for superficial adenocarcinoma of the EGJ.

摘要

背景

内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)最近被引入作为治疗食管胃交界部(EGJ)浅层腺癌的一种选择;然而,其长期临床结果尚未得到充分评估。

目的

评估 ESD 治疗 EGJ 浅层腺癌患者的长期疗效。

设计

单中心回顾性研究。

设置

大学医院。

患者

58 例患者,46 例男性和 12 例女性(平均年龄 69.3 岁),39 例 EGJ 为 T1m 腺癌,19 例为 T1sm 腺癌,于 2000 年 6 月至 2009 年 5 月接受治疗。

干预措施

采用典型序列进行 ESD 操作。

主要观察指标

评估 ESD 后的并发症、整块切除率、根治性切除率、局部复发和远处转移。根治性切除定义为无切缘和任何深部黏膜下浸润、未分化癌和血管淋巴管侵犯的组织学证据。

结果

除 3 例患者需要输血治疗溃疡出血和 1 例患者发生食管狭窄外,无重大并发症。整块切除率和根治性切除率分别为 100%和 79%。12 例切除标本被认为是非根治性的;这些患者接受了额外的 ESD(n=1)或手术切除(n=8)。在随访期间,所有达到根治性切除的患者均未观察到局部或远处复发(中位随访时间 36.6 个月,范围 4-94 个月)。

局限性

回顾性设计和单中心数据收集。

结论

ESD 后的长期结果是良好的。ESD 可能被采纳为 EGJ 浅层腺癌的治疗选择。

相似文献

1
Superficial adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: long-term results of endoscopic submucosal dissection.食管胃交界部黏膜内腺癌的内镜黏膜下剥离术:长期疗效。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Nov;72(5):960-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.07.030.
2
Clinical impact of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial adenocarcinoma located at the esophagogastric junction.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗食管胃交界部浅表腺癌的临床影响
Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Feb;67(2):202-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.09.054.
3
Long-term outcome of endoscopic resection of superficial adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.内镜下切除食管胃交界部浅表性腺癌的长期疗效。
Endoscopy. 2013 Dec;45(12):992-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1344862. Epub 2013 Nov 28.
4
Comparison of the clinicopathological characteristics and results of endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophagogastric junction and non-junctional cancers.胃食管结合部与非结合部癌内镜黏膜下剥离术的临床病理特征及疗效比较。
Digestion. 2013;87(1):29-33. doi: 10.1159/000343934. Epub 2013 Jan 21.
5
Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for tumors of the esophagogastric junction.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗食管胃交界部肿瘤的疗效及安全性
Endoscopy. 2006 Feb;38(2):170-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-921039.
6
Long-term outcomes of superficial neoplasia at the esophagogastric junction treated via endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection: a cohort study of a single center from China.中国单中心队列研究:经内镜黏膜下剥离术和内镜黏膜下隧道剥离术治疗的食管胃交界部表浅肿瘤的长期结局。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan;34(1):216-225. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06753-7. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
7
A phase II study of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal neoplasms (KDOG 0901).内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗食管浅表性肿瘤的 II 期研究(KDOG0901)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Nov;78(5):704-10. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.04.182. Epub 2013 May 13.
8
Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early stage esophagogastric junction cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.早期食管胃交界癌内镜黏膜下剥离术的临床结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Dig Liver Dis. 2015 Jan;47(1):37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2014.10.011. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
9
Conventional White Light Endoscopic Features of Small Superficial Barrett's Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.小表浅性巴雷特食管腺癌的传统白光内镜特征
Digestion. 2016;93(1):47-52. doi: 10.1159/000441764. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
10
Comparison of long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery for esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma.内镜下黏膜下剥离术与手术治疗食管胃交界腺癌的长期疗效比较。
Gastric Cancer. 2017 Mar;20(Suppl 1):84-91. doi: 10.1007/s10120-016-0679-0. Epub 2016 Dec 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative study on different endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques for the treatment of superficial esophageal cancer and precancerous lesions.不同内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗早期食管癌及癌前病变的对比研究
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Feb 10;25(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-03657-w.
2
Clinical practice guidelines for esophagogastric junction cancer: Upper GI Oncology Summit 2023.食管胃交界部癌临床实践指南:2023年上消化道肿瘤峰会
Gastric Cancer. 2024 May;27(3):401-425. doi: 10.1007/s10120-023-01457-3. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
3
Additional endoscopic treatments for patients with positive lateral margins after endoscopic resection of early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
早期食管鳞状细胞癌内镜切除术后切缘阳性患者的额外内镜治疗
Oncol Lett. 2022 Dec 23;25(2):67. doi: 10.3892/ol.2022.13653. eCollection 2023 Feb.
4
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early esophagogastric junction adenocarcinomas: a systematic review.早期食管胃交界腺癌的内镜黏膜下剥离术:一项系统评价
Ann Gastroenterol. 2022 Jul-Aug;35(4):351-361. doi: 10.20524/aog.2022.0719. Epub 2022 May 12.
5
Recent approach for preventing complications in upper gastrointestinal endoscopic submucosal dissection.预防上消化道内镜黏膜下剥离术并发症的最新方法。
DEN Open. 2021 Oct 31;2(1):e60. doi: 10.1002/deo2.60. eCollection 2022 Apr.
6
Benefit of radiofrequency ablation after widespread endoscopic resection of neoplastic Barrett's esophagus in daily practice.在日常实践中,广泛内镜切除肿瘤性巴雷特食管后进行射频消融的益处。
Ann Gastroenterol. 2022 Jan-Feb;35(1):34-41. doi: 10.20524/aog.2021.0685. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
7
Effect of Marital Status on the Survival of Patients With Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction: A Population-Based, Propensity-Matched Study.婚姻状况对食管胃结合部腺癌患者生存的影响:一项基于人群的倾向评分匹配研究。
Cancer Control. 2021 Jan-Dec;28:10732748211066309. doi: 10.1177/10732748211066309.
8
Predictors of Lymph Node Metastasis in Siewert Type II T1 Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction: A Population-Based Study.胃食管结合部 Siewert II T1 型腺癌淋巴结转移的预测因素:一项基于人群的研究。
Cancer Control. 2021 Jan-Dec;28:10732748211026668. doi: 10.1177/10732748211026668.
9
Comparing long-term outcomes between endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for type II esophagogastric junction neoplasm.比较内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)与内镜黏膜切除术(EMR)治疗II型食管胃交界部肿瘤的长期疗效。
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Feb;9(4):322. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-4265.
10
The efficacy of the application of the curative criteria of the 5 edition Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines for early adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗食管胃结合部早期腺癌应用第 5 版日本胃癌治疗指南疗效判断标准的疗效。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2021 Mar-Apr;27(2):97-104. doi: 10.4103/sjg.SJG_403_20.