Department of Mechanical Engineering and Construction, Avda. Sos Baynat s/n, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain.
Appl Ergon. 2011 Jul;42(5):652-64. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2010.09.014. Epub 2010 Oct 29.
The aim of this work is to determine the influence of multisensory (visual-haptic) integration and the level of interaction (seeing photographs, seeing the actual product, touching it and using it) on the perception of products, including perceived ergonomics. The product selected for the experiment was the hammer, as this will help to establish whether emotional design studies can also apply to 'commercial' products. Subjective opinions of users were evaluated through semantic differential tests. A factor analysis identified six semantic factors or axes (Quality/Robustness, Ergonomics/Appearance, Innovation, Lightness, Dynamic Effects, and Efficacy). Results show that Lightness and Dynamic Effects are quite sensitive to the level of interaction, while Ergonomics/Appearance is partially affected. However, the perceptions of Innovation, Quality/Robustness and Efficacy are not so affected and they could be detected through a lower level of interaction (i.e. seeing photographs). This suggests that commercial products seem sensitive to emotional design studies and that multisensory integration enhances the perception of the factors that are clearly linked with physical interaction between users and tools, i.e. Ergonomics/Appearance, Lightness and Dynamic Effects. Additionally, it should be highlighted that some aspects related with the ergonomics and ease of use of products are also perceived at different stages of interaction.
这项工作的目的是确定多感官(视觉-触觉)整合以及交互水平(看照片、看实际产品、触摸产品和使用产品)对产品感知的影响,包括感知的人体工程学。选择用于实验的产品是锤子,因为这有助于确定情感设计研究是否也可以应用于“商业”产品。通过语义差异测试评估用户的主观意见。因子分析确定了六个语义因素或轴(质量/坚固性、人体工程学/外观、创新性、轻盈感、动感效果和功效)。结果表明,轻盈感和动感效果对交互水平非常敏感,而人体工程学/外观则部分受到影响。然而,对创新性、质量/坚固性和功效的感知则不那么受影响,通过较低的交互水平(即看照片)就可以检测到这些感知。这表明商业产品似乎对情感设计研究很敏感,多感官整合增强了与用户和工具之间物理交互明显相关的因素的感知,即人体工程学/外观、轻盈感和动感效果。此外,应该强调的是,产品的某些与人体工程学和易用性相关的方面也可以在不同的交互阶段被感知到。