Results of revision tympanoplasty for chronic non-cholesteatomatous otitis media.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the success rate for revision tympanoplasty using different graft materials, to compare results of primary and re-tympanoplasty using the same technique and to analyse the effect of potential influencing factors on closure of tympanic membrane (TM) and hearing outcome.

METHODS

Study included all patients, who underwent tympanoplasty (n=617) and re-tympanoplasty (n=94) for chronic otitis media without cholesteatoma in the period between September 1998 and 2007. The data of all patients on preoperative disease, perforation size and localization, middle ear status, surgical approach, graft material, adjunctive procedures, pre- and postoperative morphological (otomicroscopy) and functional (hearing examination evaluating pure-tone audiogram) results were analyzed. All operations were performed using an underlay technique and either the retroauricular or transcanal approach. The temporal fascia, perichondrium or cartilage-perichondrium composite grafts were used for the reconstruction of TM. Ossiculoplasty was performed as needed. The interrelation between multiple pre-operative parameters and post-operative morphological (closure of the perforation) and functional (hearing level) outcomes was analysed.

RESULTS

Successful closure rates of the TM perforation were 93.6% and 90.2% of the patients in the primary and revision tympanoplasty groups, respectively. Graft take rate and hearing results did not depend on graft material. Structural changes were found more frequently in the re-tympanoplasty group (63.4% comparing to 29.5% of primary cases). Ossiculoplasty was performed more often in revision cases (24.4% comparing to 11.4% of primary cases). Successful hearing (ABG within 20dB) for primary tympanoplasties was achieved in 81.1%, and for retympanoplasty - in 69.5% of the cases. (p<0.01). There were no interrelation between any estimated parameters and the graft take rate for either primary or revision tympanoplasty.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence of increased risk of graft failure in re-tympanoplasty cases when compared to primary tympanoplasty operations. Hearing results depend on structural changes in the middle ear (ossicular abnormalities and tympanoscerosis) which in revision cases are found more often. No differences were found between fascia, perichondrum or cartilage-perichondrium grafts in terms of graft healing and hearing results.