Chauvet-Gélinier J-C
Service de psychiatrie et d'addictologie, hôpital Général, CHU de Dijon, 3, rue du Faubourg-Raines, 21000 Dijon, France.
Encephale. 2010 Oct;36(5):425-32. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2010.08.001. Epub 2010 Oct 12.
Several recent studies have underlined the importance of anxiety in major depressive disorders. It has been shown that anxiety was responsible for worsening of depression and reduction of the efficacy of the antidepressant treatment. While it is well known that SSRI are efficient in treating depression or anxiety disorders, the authors tried to determine the influence of baseline anxiety on the response to SSRI treatment in patients with severe depression receiving either escitalopram or paroxetine. In a 24-week double-blind clinical trial, 459 patients with a primary diagnosis of severe major depressive disorder were randomised to receive escitalopram (20mg) or paroxetine (40mg). Post hoc analyses of efficacy in patients with a baseline HAM-A total score less or equal to 20 (n=171) or greater than 20 (n=280) were based on analysis of covariance. (ANCOVA) (ITT, LOCF). At week 24, the mean change from baseline in MADRS total score was -24.2 for escitalopram-treated patients (n=141) and -21.5 for paroxetine treated patients (n=139) (p<0.05, between both groups) in high baseline anxiety patients (HAM-A>20) and the mean change from baseline in HAM-A total score was -17.4 (escitalopram) and -15.1 (paroxetine) (p<0.05, between both groups). As far as complete remitters (CGI-S=1) after 24-week treatment were concerned, their number was significantly higher with escitalopram in the case of marked baseline anxiety. No difference was shown in the low baseline anxiety group. Looking for the influence of baseline anxiety on SSRI treatment effects, the authors showed that antidepressant efficacy of 20mg escitalopram was better than 40mg paroxetine for patients highly depressed with comorbid anxiety symptoms and that, contrary to paroxetine, escitalopram maintained sustained antidepressant activity in patients featuring increased baseline anxiety levels.
最近的几项研究强调了焦虑在重度抑郁症中的重要性。研究表明,焦虑会导致抑郁症恶化,并降低抗抑郁治疗的疗效。虽然众所周知,选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)在治疗抑郁症或焦虑症方面有效,但作者试图确定基线焦虑对接受艾司西酞普兰或帕罗西汀治疗的重度抑郁症患者对SSRI治疗反应的影响。在一项为期24周的双盲临床试验中,459例初步诊断为重度重度抑郁症的患者被随机分配接受艾司西酞普兰(20mg)或帕罗西汀(40mg)治疗。对基线汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAM-A)总分小于或等于20(n = 171)或大于20(n = 280)的患者进行事后疗效分析,基于协方差分析(ANCOVA)(意向性分析,末次观察结转)。在第24周时,高基线焦虑患者(HAM-A>20)中,接受艾司西酞普兰治疗的患者(n = 141)的蒙哥马利-艾森伯格抑郁量表(MADRS)总分较基线的平均变化为-24.2,接受帕罗西汀治疗的患者(n = 139)为-21.5(两组之间p<0.05);HAM-A总分较基线的平均变化,艾司西酞普兰组为-17.4,帕罗西汀组为-15.1(两组之间p<0.05)。就24周治疗后的完全缓解者(临床总体印象量表-严重程度(CGI-S)=1)而言,在基线焦虑明显的情况下,艾司西酞普兰治疗的完全缓解者数量显著更高。在低基线焦虑组中未显示出差异。在探究基线焦虑对SSRI治疗效果的影响时,作者表明,对于伴有焦虑症状的高度抑郁患者,20mg艾司西酞普兰的抗抑郁疗效优于40mg帕罗西汀,并且与帕罗西汀相反,艾司西酞普兰在基线焦虑水平升高的患者中维持持续的抗抑郁活性。