Suppr超能文献

使用 DNA 结合染料和定量 PCR 测定活葡萄酒酵母。

Determination of viable wine yeast using DNA binding dyes and quantitative PCR.

机构信息

Biotecnologia Enològica, Departament de Bioquímica i Biotecnologia, Facultat d'Enologia, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Marcel·li Domingo s/n, 43007, Tarragona, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Food Microbiol. 2010 Dec 15;144(2):257-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.10.003. Epub 2010 Oct 8.

Abstract

The detection and quantification of wine yeast can be misleading due to under or overestimation of these microorganisms. Underestimation may be caused by variable growing rates of different microorganisms in culture media or the presence of viable but non-cultivable microorganisms. Overestimation may be caused by the lack of discrimination between live and dead microorganisms if quantitative PCR is used to quantify with DNA as the template. However, culture-independent methods that use dyes have been described to remove the DNA from dead cells and then quantify the live microorganisms. Two dyes have been studied in this paper: ethidium monoazide bromide (EMA) and propidium monoazide bromide (PMA). The technique was applied to grape must fermentation and ageing wines. Both dyes presented similar results on yeast monitoring. Membrane cell recovery was necessary when yeasts were originated from ethanol-containing media. When applied to grape must fermentation, differences of up to 1 log unit were seen between the QPCR estimation with or without the dye during the stationary phase. In ageing wines, good agreement was found between plating techniques and QPCR. Most of the viable cells were also culturable and no differences were observed with the methods, except for Zygosaccharomyces bailii and Dekkera bruxellensis where much higher counts were occasionally detected by QPCR. The presence of excess dead cells did not interfere with the quantification of live cells with either of the dyes.

摘要

由于对这些微生物的低估或高估,葡萄酒酵母的检测和定量可能会产生误导。低估可能是由于不同微生物在培养基中的生长速率不同,或者存在有活力但不可培养的微生物。高估可能是由于如果使用定量 PCR 以 DNA 为模板进行定量时,无法区分活微生物和死微生物。然而,已经描述了使用染料的非培养依赖性方法来去除死细胞中的 DNA,然后定量活微生物。本文研究了两种染料:溴化乙锭单叠氮化物(EMA)和溴化丙啶单叠氮化物(PMA)。该技术已应用于葡萄汁发酵和陈酿葡萄酒。两种染料在酵母监测方面均呈现出相似的结果。当酵母来源于含乙醇的培养基时,需要进行膜细胞回收。当应用于葡萄汁发酵时,在静止期,用或不用染料的 QPCR 估计值之间存在高达 1 个对数单位的差异。在陈酿葡萄酒中,平板计数技术和 QPCR 之间存在良好的一致性。大多数活细胞也可培养,除了酿酒酵母和布鲁塞尔德克酵母外,这些方法之间没有观察到差异,而 QPCR 偶尔会检测到这些酵母的数量更高。过量死细胞的存在不会干扰两种染料中活细胞的定量。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验