Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Am J Pathol. 2010 Dec;177(6):2731-40. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.100361. Epub 2010 Oct 29.
The CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP-high, CIMP1) is a distinct phenotype associated with microsatellite instability (MSI) and BRAF mutation in colon cancer. Recent evidence suggests the presence of KRAS mutation-associated CIMP subtype (CIMP-low, CIMP2). We used cluster analysis, principal component analysis (PCA), and structural equation modeling (SEM), a novel strategy, to decipher the correlation structure of CpG island hypermethylation. Using a database of 861 colon and rectal cancers, DNA methylation at 16 CpG islands [CACNA1G, CDKN2A (p16/ink4a), CHFR, CRABP1, HIC1, IGF2, IGFBP3, MGMT, MINT-1, MINT-31, MLH1, NEUROG1, p14 (CDKN2A/arf), RUNX3, SOCS1, and WRN] was quantified by real-time PCR. Tumors were categorized into three groups: Group 1 with wild-type KRAS/BRAF (N = 440); Group 2 with mutant KRAS and wild-type BRAF (N = 308); and Group 3 with wild-type KRAS and mutant BRAF (N = 107). Tumors with mutant KRAS/BRAF (N = 6) were excluded. In unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis, all but six markers (CACNA1G, IGF2, RUNX3, MGMT, MINT-1, and SOCS1) were differentially clustered with CIMP-high and CIMP-low according to KRAS and BRAF status. In SEM, the correlation structures between CIMP, locus-specific CpG island methylation, and MSI differed according to KRAS and BRAF status, which was consistent with PCA results. In conclusion, KRAS and BRAF mutations appear to differentially influence correlation structure of CpG island methylation. Our novel data suggest two distinct perturbations, resulting in differential locus-specific propensity of CpG methylation.
CpG 岛甲基化表型(CIMP-high、CIMP1)是与结直肠癌中微卫星不稳定(MSI)和 BRAF 突变相关的独特表型。最近的证据表明存在 KRAS 突变相关的 CIMP 亚型(CIMP-low、CIMP2)。我们使用聚类分析、主成分分析(PCA)和结构方程模型(SEM),一种新的策略,来破译 CpG 岛过度甲基化的相关结构。使用 861 例结肠和直肠肿瘤的数据库,通过实时 PCR 定量测定了 16 个 CpG 岛的 DNA 甲基化[CACNA1G、CDKN2A(p16/ink4a)、CHFR、CRABP1、HIC1、IGF2、IGFBP3、MGMT、MINT-1、MINT-31、MLH1、NEUROG1、p14(CDKN2A/arf)、RUNX3、SOCS1 和 WRN]。肿瘤分为三组:第 1 组 KRAS/BRAF 野生型(N=440);第 2 组 KRAS 突变型和 BRAF 野生型(N=308);第 3 组 KRAS 野生型和 BRAF 突变型(N=107)。KRAS/BRAF 突变型肿瘤(N=6)被排除在外。在无监督层次聚类分析中,除了 6 个标记物(CACNA1G、IGF2、RUNX3、MGMT、MINT-1 和 SOCS1)外,根据 KRAS 和 BRAF 状态,所有标记物都与 CIMP-high 和 CIMP-low 存在差异聚类。在 SEM 中,根据 KRAS 和 BRAF 状态,CpG 岛甲基化与 MSI 之间的相关性结构存在差异,这与 PCA 结果一致。总之,KRAS 和 BRAF 突变似乎会以不同的方式影响 CpG 岛甲基化的相关性结构。我们的新数据表明存在两种不同的干扰,导致 CpG 甲基化的差异。