Esterle Laurence, Picard Jean-François
Cermes3, Inserm U 988, CNRS UMR 8211, EHESS, 7 rue Guy Moquet, 94801 Villejuif cedex, France.
J Hist Med Allied Sci. 2011 Oct;66(4):546-70. doi: 10.1093/jhmas/jrq065. Epub 2010 Oct 30.
By focusing on funding methods, this paper considers the way in which medical research eventually led to the science-based medicine that is prevalent in France today. This process seems to have taken place in three stages during the second half of the twentieth century. In the 1940s and 1950s, two major events occurred. The first was the creation of a national health insurance fund in France, which opened up new reasons for, and ways of, funding medical research. The second was the development of antibiotics, which triggered a revival of clinical medicine. In the 1960s and 1970s, a proactive government science policy allowed the life sciences and medical research to come together in the wake of a burgeoning new science: molecular biology. Thus, in 1964, the creation of the National Health and Medical Research Institute (Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale or INSERM), destined to "molecularize" medical research, was seen as the fulfillment of the government's ambitious research policy. Today, with medicine irreversibly embedded in scientific and technical rationality, health has become a major issue in modern societies. This paper therefore touches on some of the key features of biomedical research, including the revival of funding systems for clinical research and the development of a system of research grants that was made possible by patient organizations and the creation of new funding agencies.
通过关注资金筹集方式,本文探讨了医学研究最终如何发展成为如今在法国盛行的循证医学。这一过程似乎在20世纪下半叶分三个阶段进行。在20世纪40年代和50年代,发生了两件大事。第一件是法国国家健康保险基金的创立,这为医学研究开辟了新的资金筹集理由和方式。第二件是抗生素的研发,引发了临床医学的复兴。在20世纪60年代和70年代,积极主动的政府科学政策使得生命科学与医学研究在新兴科学——分子生物学蓬勃发展之后结合在一起。因此,1964年成立的国家健康与医学研究所(Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale,简称INSERM)旨在使医学研究“分子化”,被视为政府雄心勃勃的研究政策的实现。如今,医学已不可逆转地融入科学技术理性之中,健康已成为现代社会的一个主要问题。因此,本文探讨了生物医学研究的一些关键特征,包括临床研究资金筹集系统的复兴以及由患者组织促成的研究资助体系的发展和新资助机构的创建。