• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[去除下胫腓螺钉是否能改善合并下胫腓联合损伤的踝关节骨折手术治疗的临床效果?]

[Does removal of the syndesmotic screw improve clinical results of operative treatment of ankle fractures with concomitant syndesmosis injury?].

作者信息

Kołodziej Łukasz, Kaczmarczyk Marek, Bohatyrewicz Andrzej, Budzyński Tomasz

机构信息

Klinika Ortopedii i Traumotologii, Pomorska Akademia Medyczna w Szczecinie.

出版信息

Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol. 2010 May-Jun;75(3):143-6.

PMID:21038630
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The routine procedure in cases with distal tibio-fibular syndesmotic ruptures associated with ankle fracture, is temporary fixation with a screw which is usually removed after a period considered long enough for the healing of torn syndesmotic ligaments. This ussualy requires need for a second hospitalization and generates additional costs for the health care system. The potential advantege of removing the syndesmotic stabilization is often questioned.

AIM OF THE PAPER

Aim of this study is to compare the clinical results of surgical treatment of ankle fractures with concomitant syndesmosis injury in patients where where syndesmotic screw was remowed before starting weightbearing and left intact.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In 33 patients treated surgically between 2006-2007 distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury associated with ankle fractures was diagnosed and fixed with syndesmotic screw. In 13 patients, after average 14 weeks (from 7 to 22 weeks) syndesmotic screw was remowed and in 20 cases left intact. In 8 patients screw broke after full weightbearing was started. The average follow up period was 37 months. For the evaluation of treatment AOFAS hind-foot score (American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society) was used.

RESULTS

The mean AOFAS score for patients with remowed syndesmotic screw was 89 points while in groups where there was a spontaneous fracture of the screw or screw was left intact the results were respectively 85 and 87 points and did not differ significantly between groups.

CONCLUSION

The removal of syndesmotic stabilization before weightbearing does not significantly improve the outcome of operative treatment of ankle fractures with syndesmosis injury.

摘要

引言

对于伴有踝关节骨折的胫腓下联合韧带断裂病例,常规做法是用螺钉进行临时固定,通常在认为撕裂的联合韧带愈合足够长的一段时间后取出螺钉。这通常需要再次住院,并给医疗系统带来额外费用。去除联合固定的潜在优势常常受到质疑。

本文目的

本研究的目的是比较在开始负重前取出联合螺钉和保留联合螺钉的情况下,手术治疗伴有联合损伤的踝关节骨折患者的临床结果。

材料与方法

2006年至2007年期间,对33例接受手术治疗的患者诊断出伴有踝关节骨折的胫腓下联合损伤,并用联合螺钉进行固定。13例患者在平均14周(7至22周)后取出联合螺钉,20例患者保留螺钉。8例患者在开始完全负重后螺钉断裂。平均随访期为37个月。使用美国足踝外科协会(AOFAS)后足评分来评估治疗效果。

结果

取出联合螺钉的患者平均AOFAS评分为89分,而螺钉自发断裂或保留螺钉的组的结果分别为85分和87分,两组之间无显著差异。

结论

在负重前去除联合固定并不能显著改善伴有联合损伤的踝关节骨折手术治疗的结果。

相似文献

1
[Does removal of the syndesmotic screw improve clinical results of operative treatment of ankle fractures with concomitant syndesmosis injury?].[去除下胫腓螺钉是否能改善合并下胫腓联合损伤的踝关节骨折手术治疗的临床效果?]
Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol. 2010 May-Jun;75(3):143-6.
2
Fate of the syndesmotic screw--Search for a prudent solution.下胫腓螺钉的转归——寻求合理的解决方案
Injury. 2015 Nov;46 Suppl 6:S125-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.062. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
3
Technical aspects of the syndesmotic screw and their effect on functional outcome following acute distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury.下胫腓联合螺钉的技术要点及其对急性下胫腓联合损伤后功能预后的影响。
Injury. 2014 Apr;45(4):775-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.09.035. Epub 2013 Sep 27.
4
Outcome after fixation of ankle fractures with an injury to the syndesmosis: the effect of the syndesmosis screw.下胫腓联合损伤的踝关节骨折固定术后的结果:下胫腓联合螺钉的影响
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Aug;91(8):1069-73. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B8.22430.
5
The Fate of the Fixed Syndesmosis Over Time.随着时间推移下胫腓联合的转归
Foot Ankle Int. 2015 Oct;36(10):1202-8. doi: 10.1177/1071100715588186. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
6
The radiographic fate of the syndesmosis after trans-syndesmotic screw removal in displaced ankle fractures.移位性踝关节骨折经下胫腓联合螺钉取出后下胫腓联合的影像学转归
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2011 Jul-Aug;50(4):407-12. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2011.03.014. Epub 2011 May 18.
7
Fixation of ankle syndesmotic injuries: comparison of tightrope fixation and syndesmotic screw fixation for accuracy of syndesmotic reduction.踝关节联合损伤的固定:经皮克氏针固定与联合螺钉固定治疗踝关节联合损伤的准确性比较。
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Dec;40(12):2828-35. doi: 10.1177/0363546512461480. Epub 2012 Oct 10.
8
A prospective randomised study comparing TightRope and syndesmotic screw fixation for accuracy and maintenance of syndesmotic reduction assessed with bilateral computed tomography.一项前瞻性随机研究,比较TightRope和下胫腓联合螺钉固定在下胫腓联合复位准确性及维持方面的效果,采用双侧计算机断层扫描进行评估。
Injury. 2015;46(6):1119-26. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.02.004. Epub 2015 Feb 21.
9
Functional outcomes after syndesmotic screw fixation and removal.下胫腓联合螺钉固定及取出后的功能结局
J Orthop Trauma. 2010 Jan;24(1):12-6. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181c6e199.
10
No difference in functional and radiographic results 8.4 years after quadricortical compared with tricortical syndesmosis fixation in ankle fractures.在踝关节骨折中,与三层皮质骨下胫腓联合固定相比,四层皮质骨下胫腓联合固定8.4年后的功能和影像学结果并无差异。
J Orthop Trauma. 2010 Jan;24(1):17-23. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181bedca1.

引用本文的文献

1
Is There Any Purpose in Routine Syndesmotic Screw Removal? Systematic Literature Review.常规下胫腓联合螺钉取出有意义吗?系统文献综述。
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 15;13(16):4805. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164805.
2
Treatment of a high-energy transsyndesmotic ankle fracture: A case report of "logsplitter injury".高能经下胫腓联合踝关节骨折的治疗:一例“劈木机损伤”病例报告
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Feb;99(9):e19380. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019380.