Elek Elvira, Wagstaff David A, Hecht Michael L
RTI International, Washington, DC 20005, USA.
J Drug Educ. 2010;40(1):61-79. doi: 10.2190/DE.40.1.e.
This study assessed the outcomes of adapting the culturally-grounded, middle school, substance-use prevention intervention, keepin ' it REAL (kiR), to target elementary school students and to address acculturation. At the beginning of 5th grade, 29 schools were randomly assigned to conditions obtained by crossing grade of implementation (5th, 7th, 5th + 7th, and control/comparison) by curriculum version [kiR-Plus vs. kiR-Acculturation Enhanced (AE)]. Students (n = 1984) completed 6 assessments through the end of 8th grade. The kiR curricula generally appear no more effective than the comparison schools' programming. Students receiving either version of the kiR intervention in only the 5th grade report greater increases in substance use than did control students. Receiving the kiR-AE version twice (both 5th and 7th grades) has benefits over receiving it once.
本研究评估了对基于文化背景的中学物质使用预防干预措施“保持真实(kiR)”进行调整,以针对小学生并解决文化适应问题的效果。在五年级开始时,29所学校被随机分配到通过课程版本[kiR增强版与文化适应增强版(AE)]与实施年级(五年级、七年级、五年级 + 七年级以及对照/比较组)交叉得到的不同条件下。学生(n = 1984)在八年级结束时完成了6次评估。kiR课程总体上似乎并不比对照学校的课程更有效。仅在五年级接受任一版本kiR干预的学生报告的物质使用增加幅度大于对照组学生。接受两次kiR - AE版本(五年级和七年级都接受)比只接受一次有好处。