• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

5% 利多卡因贴剂与其他相关干预措施和安慰剂治疗疱疹后神经痛(PHN)的系统评价。

5% lidocaine-medicated plaster vs other relevant interventions and placebo for post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN): a systematic review.

机构信息

Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK.

出版信息

Acta Neurol Scand. 2011 May;123(5):295-309. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2010.01433.x. Epub 2010 Oct 10.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0404.2010.01433.x
PMID:21039364
Abstract

Several pharmacological treatments are used to manage post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN). The use of topical analgesics, such as 5% lidocaine-medicated plaster (5% LMP), may be preferable to systemic treatments in that they are formulated to produce a local pain relieving effect with minimal systemic absorption. However, direct head-to-head comparisons are relatively few, and a rigorous assessment of the relative efficacy and safety of the various treatment options is lacking. The objective of this study was to compare 5% LMP for the relief of PHN with other relevant interventions and placebo. Six databases were searched up to May 2010. Quantitative methods for data synthesis were used, and a network meta-analysis was conducted. Twenty unique studies (32 publications) were included. Placebo-controlled studies showed 5% LMP to be effective in providing pain relief and reducing allodynia while adverse event rates were generally low. A comparison between 5% LMP and pregabalin indicated the non-inferiority of 5% LMP for pain reduction and showed greater improvement of quality of life for 5% LMP. Adverse events (AE) were significantly fewer with 5% LMP. In the network meta-analysis, only 5% LMP and gabapentin were associated with a greater change in pain from baseline than placebo [-15.50 (95% CI -18.85 to -12.16) and -7.56 (95% CI -12.52 to -2.59) respectively]. 5% LMP was shown to be more effective than capsaicin [-16.45 (95% CI -20.04 to -12.86)], gabapentin [-7.95 (95% CI -13.29 to -2.61)] and pregabalin [-13.45 (95% CI -19.19 to -7.71)]. For pain relief, two comparators were more effective than placebo [mean pain relief, gabapentin: 32.77 (95% CI 15.57-49.97); 5% LMP: 26.77 (95% CI 9.11-44.43)]. 5% LMP was shown to be comparable to gabapentin [-6.00 (95% CI -25.32-13.32)]. The results suggest that 5% LMP and gabapentin have similar effects on pain relief and that 5% LMP is more effective than capsaicin and pregabalin (change in pain from baseline). Topical agents, such as 5% LMP, are associated with fewer and less clinically significant AE than is the case for systemic agents. However, small numbers, and limited size and quality of included studies should be taken into account. Further studies are needed.

摘要

几种药理学治疗方法被用于治疗疱疹后神经痛 (PHN)。与全身治疗相比,局部使用止痛剂,如 5%利多卡因贴剂(5% LMP),可能更可取,因为它们的配方旨在产生局部止痛效果,同时最小化全身吸收。然而,直接的头对头比较相对较少,并且缺乏对各种治疗选择的相对疗效和安全性的严格评估。本研究的目的是比较 5% LMP 与其他相关干预措施和安慰剂对 PHN 的缓解作用。六个数据库被搜索到 2010 年 5 月。使用了数据综合的定量方法,并进行了网络荟萃分析。纳入了 20 项独特的研究(32 篇文献)。安慰剂对照研究表明,5% LMP 可有效缓解疼痛并减轻痛觉过敏,而不良事件发生率通常较低。5% LMP 与普瑞巴林的比较表明,5% LMP 在减轻疼痛方面不劣于普瑞巴林,并显示出 5% LMP 对生活质量的改善更大。5% LMP 的不良事件明显较少。在网络荟萃分析中,只有 5% LMP 和加巴喷丁与安慰剂相比,疼痛从基线的变化更大[-15.50(95%CI-18.85 至-12.16)和-7.56(95%CI-12.52 至-2.59)]。5% LMP 被证明比辣椒素[-16.45(95%CI-20.04 至-12.86)]、加巴喷丁[-7.95(95%CI-13.29 至-2.61)]和普瑞巴林[-13.45(95%CI-19.19 至-7.71)]更有效。对于缓解疼痛,两种对照药物比安慰剂更有效[平均疼痛缓解,加巴喷丁:32.77(95%CI 15.57-49.97);5% LMP:26.77(95%CI 9.11-44.43)]。5% LMP 与加巴喷丁相当[-6.00(95%CI-25.32-13.32)]。结果表明,5% LMP 和加巴喷丁在缓解疼痛方面有相似的效果,5% LMP 比辣椒素和普瑞巴林更有效(疼痛从基线的变化)。局部制剂,如 5% LMP,与全身制剂相比,不良事件更少且不那么具有临床意义。然而,应考虑到纳入研究的数量较少、规模较小和质量较低。需要进一步的研究。

相似文献

1
5% lidocaine-medicated plaster vs other relevant interventions and placebo for post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN): a systematic review.5% 利多卡因贴剂与其他相关干预措施和安慰剂治疗疱疹后神经痛(PHN)的系统评价。
Acta Neurol Scand. 2011 May;123(5):295-309. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2010.01433.x. Epub 2010 Oct 10.
2
Gabapentin for chronic neuropathic pain in adults.加巴喷丁用于治疗成人慢性神经性疼痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 9;6(6):CD007938. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007938.pub4.
3
Antiepileptic drugs for chronic non-cancer pain in children and adolescents.用于儿童和青少年慢性非癌性疼痛的抗癫痫药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 5;8(8):CD012536. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012536.pub2.
4
5% lidocaine medicated plaster in painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN): a systematic review.5% 盐酸利多卡因贴剂治疗糖尿病周围神经病理性疼痛的系统评价
Swiss Med Wkly. 2010 May 29;140(21-22):297-306. doi: 10.4414/smw.2010.12995.
5
Antidepressants for chronic non-cancer pain in children and adolescents.用于治疗儿童和青少年慢性非癌性疼痛的抗抑郁药。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 5;8(8):CD012535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012535.pub2.
6
Benefits and safety of gabapentinoids in chronic low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.加巴喷丁类药物用于慢性下腰痛的获益与安全性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
PLoS Med. 2017 Aug 15;14(8):e1002369. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002369. eCollection 2017 Aug.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
9
Topical analgesics for acute and chronic pain in adults - an overview of Cochrane Reviews.用于成人急慢性疼痛的局部镇痛药——Cochrane系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 12;5(5):CD008609. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008609.pub2.
10
Topical capsaicin (high concentration) for chronic neuropathic pain in adults.局部用辣椒素(高浓度)治疗成人慢性神经性疼痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 13;1(1):CD007393. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007393.pub4.

引用本文的文献

1
Emergency Department Management of Low Back Pain: A Comparative Review of Guidelines and Practices.急诊科下腰痛管理:指南与实践的比较性综述
Cureus. 2024 Feb 6;16(2):e53712. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53712. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Subgrouping patients with zoster-associated pain according to sensory symptom profiles: A cluster analysis.根据感觉症状特征对带状疱疹相关性疼痛患者进行亚组划分:一项聚类分析。
Front Neurol. 2023 Feb 17;14:1137453. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1137453. eCollection 2023.
3
Pain management in the emergency department: a clinical review.
急诊科的疼痛管理:一项临床综述。
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2021 Dec;8(4):268-278. doi: 10.15441/ceem.21.161. Epub 2021 Dec 31.
4
Topical Lidocaine for Chronic Pain Treatment.局部利多卡因治疗慢性疼痛。
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2021 Sep 29;15:4091-4103. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S328228. eCollection 2021.
5
Current Strategies for the Management of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy.目前治疗糖尿病性神经痛的策略。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Mar;16(2):341-352. doi: 10.1177/1932296820951829. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
6
Herpes Zoster and Immunogenicity and Safety of Zoster Vaccines in Transplant Patients: A Narrative Review of the Literature.带状疱疹以及移植患者中带状疱疹疫苗的免疫原性和安全性:文献综述
Front Immunol. 2018 Jul 16;9:1632. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01632. eCollection 2018.
7
The 5% Lidocaine-Medicated Plaster: Its Inclusion in International Treatment Guidelines for Treating Localized Neuropathic Pain, and Clinical Evidence Supporting its Use.5%利多卡因贴剂:被纳入治疗局部神经性疼痛的国际治疗指南及其使用的临床证据
Pain Ther. 2016 Dec;5(2):149-169. doi: 10.1007/s40122-016-0060-3. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
8
The topical 5% lidocaine medicated plaster in localized neuropathic pain: a reappraisal of the clinical evidence.局部用5%利多卡因药用贴剂治疗局部神经性疼痛:临床证据的重新评估
J Pain Res. 2016 Feb 12;9:67-79. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S99231. eCollection 2016.
9
Case studies illustrating the management of trigeminal neuropathic pain using topical 5% lidocaine plasters.使用5%利多卡因贴剂治疗三叉神经病理性疼痛的病例研究。
Br J Pain. 2013 May;7(2):107-13. doi: 10.1177/2049463713483459.
10
The search for novel analgesics: targets and mechanisms.新型镇痛药的探索:靶点与机制
F1000Prime Rep. 2015 May 26;7:56. doi: 10.12703/P7-56. eCollection 2015.