• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

感染性导线取出成功后的中期高死亡率。

High mid-term mortality following successful lead extraction for infection.

作者信息

Henrikson Charles A, Zhang Karl, Brinker Jeffrey A

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011 Jan;34(1):32-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02941.x. Epub 2010 Oct 29.

DOI:10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02941.x
PMID:21039644
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transvenous lead extraction patients tend to have multiple medical problems complicated by prolonged infections that may result in high-mortality rates following a successful procedure.

METHODS

All adult patients referred for lead extraction for infection over a 4-year period were included in this study. Mortality following the procedure was assessed using hospital records and the Social Security Death Index.

RESULTS

Indications for extraction were systemic infection (n = 34) and isolated pocket infection (n = 33). Of the 67 patients, 47 (70%) were still alive at follow-up (6-55 months). No patient died during or within 24 hours of the procedure, and two were sent to emergent surgery and did well. However, five died during prolonged hospitalizations, and two were discharged to hospice care and died shortly thereafter. The remaining 13 deaths occurred after discharge from the hospital at a mean interval of 15 months (range, 24 days to 35 months) following the procedure. Notably, six of seven patients who died in the hospital, and nine of 13 who died after discharge, had bacteremia as their indication for extraction, for an overall mortality risk of 44% in patients with systemic infection.

CONCLUSIONS

True risk assessment for lead extraction patients is underestimated and may be related to the focus on the procedural risks, while the underlying illness and physiologic state may account for the excess mortality following a successful extraction. In most cases, the infected hardware contributed to the length and severity of the illness, and thus earlier consideration for extraction may be warranted.

摘要

背景

经静脉导线拔除患者往往存在多种医疗问题,并伴有长期感染,这可能导致手术成功后死亡率较高。

方法

本研究纳入了在4年期间因感染而转诊进行导线拔除的所有成年患者。使用医院记录和社会保障死亡指数评估术后死亡率。

结果

拔除指征为全身感染(n = 34)和孤立的囊袋感染(n = 33)。67例患者中,47例(70%)在随访(6 - 55个月)时仍存活。手术期间或术后24小时内无患者死亡,2例接受急诊手术且情况良好。然而,5例在长期住院期间死亡,2例出院后接受临终关怀并随后死亡。其余13例死亡发生在出院后,术后平均间隔15个月(范围,24天至35个月)。值得注意的是,7例住院死亡患者中有6例,13例出院后死亡患者中有9例,其拔除指征为菌血症,全身感染患者的总体死亡风险为44%。

结论

导线拔除患者的真正风险评估被低估,可能与关注手术风险有关,而潜在疾病和生理状态可能是成功拔除后死亡率过高的原因。在大多数情况下,感染的硬件导致了疾病的持续时间和严重程度,因此可能有必要更早考虑拔除。

相似文献

1
High mid-term mortality following successful lead extraction for infection.感染性导线取出成功后的中期高死亡率。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011 Jan;34(1):32-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02941.x. Epub 2010 Oct 29.
2
Contributions of advanced techniques to the success and safety of transvenous leads extraction.先进技术对经静脉导线拔除术成功与安全的贡献。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009 Mar;32 Suppl 1:S38-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.02225.x.
3
Laser lead extraction: predictors of success and complications.激光导线拔除:成功与并发症的预测因素
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007 Feb;30(2):214-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00652.x.
4
Transvenous pacemaker lead removal is safe and effective even in large vegetations: an analysis of 53 cases of pacemaker lead endocarditis.经静脉拔除起搏器导线即使在存在大量赘生物的情况下也是安全有效的:53例起搏器导线心内膜炎的分析
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006 Mar;29(3):231-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2006.00328.x.
5
Cardiac resynchronization therapy after coronary sinus lead extraction: feasibility and mid-term outcome of transvenous reimplantation in a tertiary referral centre.经冠状窦导线拔除后行心脏再同步治疗:在三级转诊中心行经静脉再植入的可行性和中期结果。
Europace. 2012 Apr;14(4):515-21. doi: 10.1093/europace/eur339. Epub 2011 Oct 28.
6
Predictors of 30-day and 1-year mortality after transvenous lead extraction: a single-centre experience.经静脉导线拔除术后 30 天和 1 年死亡率的预测因素:单中心经验。
Europace. 2014 Aug;16(8):1218-25. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut410. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
7
Laser assistance for extraction of chronically implanted endocardial leads: infectious versus noninfectious indications.激光辅助拔除长期植入的心内膜导线:感染性与非感染性适应证
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006 Dec;29(12):1352-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2006.00547.x.
8
Should all dysfunctional high-voltage leads be extracted? Results of a single-centre long-term registry.所有功能失调的高压引线都应拔除吗?单中心长期登记研究结果。
Europace. 2012 Dec;14(12):1764-70. doi: 10.1093/europace/eus202. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
9
Safety and effectiveness of transvenous lead extraction in octogenarians.80 岁以上患者经静脉心内膜导线拔除术的安全性和有效性。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012 Oct;23(10):1103-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2012.02372.x. Epub 2012 Aug 6.
10
Percutaneous pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead extraction in 100 patients with intracardiac vegetations defined by transesophageal echocardiogram.经食管超声心动图定义的 100 例心内膜赘生物患者的经皮起搏器和植入式心脏复律除颤器导线拔除术。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Mar 2;55(9):886-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.034.

引用本文的文献

1
Percutaneous Extraction of Transvenous Permanent Pacemaker/Defibrillator Leads-A Single-Center Experience.经皮静脉内永久性起搏器/除颤器导线取出术:单中心经验。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Aug 21;60(8):1360. doi: 10.3390/medicina60081360.
2
Trends and outcomes of inpatient cardiac implantable electronic device transvenous lead extractions: a nationwide analysis.住院患者心脏植入式电子设备经静脉导线拔除的趋势与结果:一项全国性分析。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024 Aug 6. doi: 10.1007/s10840-024-01891-y.
3
Long-Term Outcomes of Transvenous Lead Extraction: A Comparison in Patients with or without Infection from the Italian Region with the Oldest Population.
经静脉导线拔除的长期预后:来自意大利老龄化人口地区的有或无感染患者的比较
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 7;12(13):4543. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134543.
4
Prognosis after lead extraction in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices infection: Comparison of lead-related infective endocarditis with pocket infection in a Japanese single-center experience.心脏植入式电子设备感染患者拔除导线后的预后:日本单中心经验中导线相关感染性心内膜炎与囊袋感染的比较。
J Arrhythm. 2019 Jun 28;35(4):654-663. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12164. eCollection 2019 Aug.
5
Snare sheath versus evolution sheath in transvenous lead extraction.经静脉导线拔除术中圈套器鞘管与进化鞘管的比较
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Nov 15;8(11):21975-80. eCollection 2015.
6
One-Year Follow-Up of Patients Undergoing Transvenous Extraction of Pacemaker and Defibrillator Leads.接受经静脉拔除起搏器和除颤器导线患者的一年随访
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 22;10(12):e0144915. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144915. eCollection 2015.
7
Extraction of chronically implanted cardiovascular electronic device leads.长期植入的心血管电子设备导线的取出
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2014 Aug;16(8):325. doi: 10.1007/s11936-014-0325-2.
8
Implantable defibrillator lead extraction with optimized standard extraction techniques.优化标准拔除技术的植入式心脏除颤器导线拔除。
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2013 Mar;10(1):3-9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5411.2013.01.002.