Suppr超能文献

两种含芽孢杆菌的益生菌添加剂对肉仔鸡胴体特性、血脂和盲肠挥发性脂肪酸的影响。

Effects of two probiotic additives containing Bacillus spores on carcass characteristics, blood lipids and cecal volatile fatty acids in meat type chickens.

机构信息

Emona - Nutrition research and development department, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

出版信息

J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2011 Aug;95(4):424-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2010.01068.x. Epub 2010 Oct 29.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate effects of two commercially available probiotic additives, containing Bacillus spores, on carcass and meat characteristics, serum lipids and concentration of cecal volatile fatty acids of meat type chickens. Birds were fed regular corn-soy meal based feed (control), supplemented with additive A, containing 1.6 × 10(6) spores per gram of feed of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis (group A) or additive B, containing the same concentration of Bacillus cereus var. toyoi spores (group B). One hundred and twenty birds (20 per replicate) were slaughtered at the age of 55 days. Results showed that birds in group B had higher (p < 0.05) final body weight compared to birds from group A and higher carcass weights and yield percentages compared with control. Breasts and whole legs were also heavier in group B, compared to control, but not the yield. Group A had higher yield of wings and lower abdominal fat weight compared to group B (p< 0.05), but not compared with control. Total cholesterol was not affected by the dietary treatment, on contrary both probiotics elevated the LDL (p < 0.05) and lowered HDL cholesterol, thus unfavourably changed animal's blood serum cholesterol profile. Both probiotics influenced the cecal fermentation, which was observed as decrease in cecal concentrations of propionic, butyric, n-butyric and n-valeric acids, but the differences compared to control group were statistically significant for group A only. It was established that probiotic additive B was more effective regarding carcass and meat part weights than additive A, however the animals from group B also had more abdominal fat and their meat had significantly higher conductivity than control group, which is not considered as beneficial.

摘要

本研究旨在评估两种市售益生菌添加剂(含芽孢杆菌孢子)对肉用型鸡的胴体和肉质特性、血清脂质及盲肠挥发性脂肪酸浓度的影响。试验鸡饲喂常规玉米-豆粕基础日粮(对照组)或添加 A(含有 1.6×10(6) 孢子/克饲料的枯草芽孢杆菌和地衣芽孢杆菌,A 组)或添加 B(含有相同浓度的解淀粉芽孢杆菌 var. toyoi 孢子,B 组)的日粮。每组 20 只鸡(重复 10 只),于 55 日龄时屠宰。结果表明,B 组鸡的末重显著高于 A 组和对照组(P<0.05),B 组鸡的屠体重和屠宰率也显著高于对照组。B 组鸡的胸肌和全腿重显著高于对照组,但产肉率没有差异。A 组鸡的翅膀产肉率显著高于 B 组(P<0.05),腹脂重显著低于 B 组(P<0.05),但与对照组无差异。日粮处理对总胆固醇没有影响,但两种益生菌均显著提高了 LDL(P<0.05),降低了 HDL 胆固醇,从而使动物的血清胆固醇谱变差。两种益生菌均影响盲肠发酵,导致盲肠丙酸、丁酸、正丁酸和正戊酸浓度降低,但仅 A 组与对照组相比差异显著。结果表明,与 A 组相比,B 组在提高胴体和肉用部分重量方面更有效,但 B 组鸡的腹脂更多,其肉的导电性显著高于对照组,这并不被认为是有益的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验