Suppr超能文献

缓慢与标准帕罗西汀滴定治疗惊恐障碍:一项前瞻性随机试验。

Slow vs standard up-titration of paroxetine in the treatment of panic disorder: a prospective randomized trial.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Milan, Fondazione IRCCS Ca'Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Luigi Sacco Hospital, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2010 Dec;64(6):612-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2010.02136.x. Epub 2010 Oct 12.

Abstract

AIM

Patients with panic disorder (PD) might be sensitive to the stimulating effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI), thus requiring low dosages at treatment initiation. The aim of the present study was to assess eventual differences in terms of effectiveness and tolerability between a slow up-titration with paroxetine and a standard one.

METHODS

In an open randomized, multicenter, primary-care study, 60 patients (44 women and 16 men) with PD with or without agoraphobia were enrolled and randomized to receive a slow up-titration with paroxetine (increments of 2.5 mg/day every 2 days) or a standard one (increments of 10 mg/day every week) up to a maximum daily dose of 20 mg. Repeated-measures anova on sub-items scores of the Panic Attack Anticipatory Anxiety Scale (PAAS) and Dosage Record and Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale (DOTES), respectively, used as outcome measures of effectiveness and tolerability, were performed. Significance level was set at 0.05 and it was not corrected.

RESULTS

anova showed no differences between the two treatments in terms of effectiveness and tolerability. Post hoc analysis found only one significant difference in the intensity of spontaneous panic attacks (Panic and Anticipatory Anxiety Scale) in the first 9 days of treatment between the two treatment groups, which was that this item was less intense in the slow-titration group (treatment effect: F = 4.89, P = 0.03, effect size = 0.1).

CONCLUSION

Present findings suggest only a small superiority for a slow up-titration regimen of paroxetine compared to a standard one in the first 9 days of treatment but no differences at end-point.

摘要

目的

惊恐障碍(PD)患者可能对选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)的刺激作用敏感,因此在治疗开始时需要低剂量。本研究旨在评估帕罗西汀缓慢滴定与标准滴定在疗效和耐受性方面的差异。

方法

在一项开放、随机、多中心的初级保健研究中,纳入了 60 名伴有或不伴有广场恐怖症的 PD 患者(44 名女性和 16 名男性),并将其随机分为两组:接受帕罗西汀缓慢滴定(每天增加 2.5mg,每 2 天增加一次)或标准滴定(每周增加 10mg),最大日剂量为 20mg。采用重复测量方差分析分别对惊恐发作预期焦虑量表(PAAS)和剂量记录和治疗中出现的症状量表(DOTES)的亚项评分进行分析,作为疗效和耐受性的评价指标。显著性水平设为 0.05,且未进行校正。

结果

方差分析显示,两种治疗方法在疗效和耐受性方面无差异。事后分析发现,在治疗的前 9 天,两组之间只有一个关于自发性惊恐发作强度(惊恐和预期焦虑量表)的差异,即缓慢滴定组的该项目强度较低(治疗效果:F = 4.89,P = 0.03,效应量 = 0.1)。

结论

本研究结果表明,在治疗的前 9 天,帕罗西汀缓慢滴定方案仅略优于标准滴定方案,但在终点时无差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验