Wakamoto Hiroyuki, Fukuda Mitsumasa, Shigemi Ritsuko, Murakami Yoshitaka, Motoki Takahiro, Ohmori Hiromitsu, Ishii Eiichi
Department of Pediatrics, Ehime Rehabilitation Center for Children, Ehime, Japan.
Brain Dev. 2011 Aug;33(7):589-92. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2010.09.013. Epub 2010 Oct 30.
Although the current diagnostic criteria for childhood absence epilepsy (CAE) do not specifically exclude children with generalized tonic clonic seizures (GTCSs) occurring before or early in the course of the active absence seizures, some workers have suggested that they should be interpreted as doing so. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical features between children with typical CAE and those with atypical CAE with preceding or simultaneous episodes of GTCS (atypical CAE-GTCS).
A total of 11 patients with atypical CAE-GTCS and 30 with typical CAE were identified by using the current CAE criteria. Their clinical data, including age, sex, family history of epilepsy, personal history of febrile convulsions, onset ages of absences and GTCS, treatment, and outcome were statistically analyzed.
The two groups had the same mean onset age of absences (6years), and their seizure outcome was comparably favorable in terms of both absences and GTCS. There was no significant difference in other clinical data except for the onset age of GTCS between the groups.
These findings show the similarity in the main clinical features between the groups, suggesting that some patients with atypical CAE-GTCS may have a variant form of CAE with early onset of GTCS.
尽管目前儿童失神癫痫(CAE)的诊断标准并未明确排除在活动性失神发作之前或发作过程早期出现全身强直阵挛发作(GTCS)的儿童,但一些研究者认为应将这些标准理解为具有这样的排除意义。本研究的目的是比较典型CAE儿童与伴有GTCS发作(非典型CAE-GTCS)的非典型CAE儿童的临床特征。
采用现行的CAE标准,共确定了11例非典型CAE-GTCS患儿和30例典型CAE患儿。对他们的临床资料进行了统计分析,包括年龄、性别、癫痫家族史、热性惊厥个人史、失神发作和GTCS的起病年龄、治疗情况及转归。
两组失神发作的平均起病年龄相同(6岁),失神发作和GTCS的发作转归相当。除GTCS起病年龄外,两组间其他临床资料无显著差异。
这些结果表明两组主要临床特征相似,提示一些非典型CAE-GTCS患儿可能患有伴有GTCS早期发作的CAE变异型。