Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital Boston, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Pediatrics. 2010 Dec;126(6):e1578-84. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-1059. Epub 2010 Nov 1.
The true rate of neurologic sequelae and infection from penetrating palatal trauma in children is unknown, which leads to significant variation in testing and treatment.
To (1) determine the incidence of stroke and infection in well-appearing children with penetrating palatal trauma and (2) describe patterns of testing and treatment for uncomplicated palatal trauma.
We assembled a retrospective cohort of children aged 9 months to 18 years with palatal trauma seen in the emergency department (ED) at a tertiary care pediatric hospital. Patients met the following definition: well-appearing with normal neurologic examination and a palate laceration but no findings requiring immediate operative care. Stroke was defined as any abnormal neurologic examination secondary to palatal trauma. Infection was defined as cellulitis or abscess secondary to palatal injury. All abnormal computed tomographic angiography (CTA) findings, except for free air, were considered positive and potentially significant.
We identified 1656 potential subjects. A total of 995 of 1656 subjects were screened, and 205 of 995 met the case definition. A total of 122 of 205 had follow-up through at least 1 week after injury. The incidence of stroke in our study population was 0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0-2.5). One of 116 patients developed infection, for an incidence of 0.9% (95% CI: 0-5.3). A total of 90 of 205 (44%) subjects had CTA scans; the results of 9 (10%) were positive. No patients with positive CTA findings required operative care. No patients received anticoagulant medications.
The incidence of morbidity from penetrating palatal trauma in the well-appearing child is extremely low. Diagnostic evaluation in the ED did not prompt clinical interventions other than antibiotics.
穿透性腭裂创伤患儿的神经后遗症和感染的真实发生率尚不清楚,这导致了检测和治疗方法存在显著差异。
(1)确定表现良好的穿透性腭裂创伤患儿中中风和感染的发生率;(2)描述单纯腭裂创伤的检测和治疗模式。
我们组建了一个回顾性队列,纳入了在一家三级儿童专科医院急诊科就诊的年龄在 9 个月至 18 岁之间的表现良好的、伴有腭裂裂伤但无即刻手术指征的患儿。患者符合以下定义:神经检查正常,表现良好,有腭裂裂伤,但无需要立即手术的发现。将任何由腭裂创伤引起的异常神经检查定义为中风。将任何由腭裂损伤引起的蜂窝织炎或脓肿定义为感染。除游离气体外,所有异常的计算机断层血管造影(CTA)发现均被认为是阳性和潜在有意义的。
我们确定了 1656 名潜在的研究对象。共对 1656 名研究对象中的 995 名进行了筛查,995 名中有 205 名符合病例定义。205 名中有 122 名在创伤后至少 1 周时进行了随访。我们研究人群中的中风发生率为 0%(95%置信区间:0-2.5)。116 名患者中有 1 名发生感染,发病率为 0.9%(95%置信区间:0-5.3)。共有 205 名患者中的 90 名进行了 CTA 扫描;9 名(10%)的结果为阳性。没有阳性 CTA 发现的患者需要手术治疗。没有患者接受抗凝药物治疗。
表现良好的穿透性腭裂创伤患儿的发病率极低。急诊科的诊断评估并未提示除抗生素以外的临床干预。