• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

StarClose™用于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后股总动脉分叉远端动脉穿刺部位止血的疗效及长期安全性

Efficacy and long-term safety of StarClose™ for hemostasis of arterial puncture sites distal to common femoral artery bifurcation after percutaneous coronary interventions.

作者信息

Dehghani Payam, Mohammad Atif, Marcuzzi Danny, Hong Tony, Holmes Kate, Evangelista Melma Jean S, Boutin Adrien, Leong-Poi Howard, Cheema Asim N

机构信息

Terrence Donnelly Heart Center, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Invasive Cardiol. 2010 Nov;22(11):505-10.

PMID:21041844
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Currently approved vascular closure devices (VCDs) are not recommended for use in arterial puncture sites distal to the common femoral artery (CFA) bifurcation. The StarClose™ vascular system (SC) is a unique VCD that does not contain intravascular components, a feature that may allow safe use in smaller vessels.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the efficacy and long-term safety of the SC for hemostasis of arterial punctures distal to the CFA bifurcation.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with arterial puncture sites located distal to the CFA bifurcation received SC after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients were ambulated 4-6 hours later, and the presence of vascular complications was determined clinically before hospital discharge. Clinical and Doppler ultrasound examinations were performed at 8-9 months to assess long-term safety.

RESULTS

A total of 106 patients undergoing PCI were included in the study. Mean age was 66 ± 12 years and 63% were male. The arterial puncture site was located in the superficial femoral artery (SFA) in 76 (72%), the profunda femoris artery (PFA) in 22 (21%) and undetermined in 8 (7%) patients. The mean diameter of the CFA was significantly greater than the SFA or the PFA branch with the SC (6.2 ± 1.5 vs. 4.5 ± 1.0 mm for the CFA and branch with SC, respectively; p < 0.0001). Device success was achieved in 102 (96%) patients. At 24 hours, a hematoma ≥ 5 cm was reported in 13 (12%) patients. No other vascular complications occurred. At a mean follow up of 9 ± 2.5 months, there was no clinical or Doppler evidence of arterial insufficiency or vascular complications.

CONCLUSION

The SC can be used for hemostasis after PCI in select cases where the arterial puncture site is located distal to the CFA bifurcation without adverse clinical outcomes.

摘要

背景

目前批准使用的血管闭合装置(VCDs)不推荐用于股总动脉(CFA)分叉远端的动脉穿刺部位。StarClose™血管系统(SC)是一种独特的VCD,不包含血管内组件,这一特性可能使其能够安全用于较小血管。

目的

我们试图确定SC用于CFA分叉远端动脉穿刺止血的有效性和长期安全性。

方法

连续的CFA分叉远端动脉穿刺部位的患者在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后接受SC。4 - 6小时后让患者下床活动,并在出院前临床确定是否存在血管并发症。在8 - 9个月时进行临床和多普勒超声检查以评估长期安全性。

结果

共有106例接受PCI的患者纳入研究。平均年龄为66±12岁,63%为男性。76例(72%)患者的动脉穿刺部位位于股浅动脉(SFA),22例(21%)位于股深动脉(PFA),8例(7%)患者未明确。CFA的平均直径显著大于使用SC时的SFA或PFA分支(CFA和使用SC的分支分别为6.2±1.5 vs. 4.5±1.0 mm;p < 0.0001)。102例(96%)患者实现了装置成功。24小时时,13例(12%)患者报告有≥5 cm的血肿。未发生其他血管并发症。平均随访9±2.5个月时,没有临床或多普勒证据表明存在动脉供血不足或血管并发症。

结论

在动脉穿刺部位位于CFA分叉远端的特定情况下,SC可用于PCI后的止血,且无不良临床结局。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and long-term safety of StarClose™ for hemostasis of arterial puncture sites distal to common femoral artery bifurcation after percutaneous coronary interventions.StarClose™用于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后股总动脉分叉远端动脉穿刺部位止血的疗效及长期安全性
J Invasive Cardiol. 2010 Nov;22(11):505-10.
2
Acute evaluation of the Mynx vascular closure device during arterial re-puncture in an ovine model.在绵羊模型中对Mynx血管闭合装置在动脉再次穿刺时进行急性评估。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2009 Jun;21(6):283-5.
3
Vascular closure devices: is the case closed?
J Invasive Cardiol. 2010 Dec;22(12):568-70.
4
Closure device or manual compression in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized comparison.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者使用闭合装置或手动压迫的随机对照比较
J Invasive Cardiol. 2010 Dec;22(12):562-6.
5
Use of FemoStop system for arterial puncture site closure after coronary angioplasty.
J Invasive Cardiol. 2004 May;16(5):240-2.
6
Cardio-respiratory exercise testing early after the use of the Angio-Seal system for arterial puncture site closure after coronary angioplasty.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后应用 Angio-Seal 系统行动脉穿刺部位封堵后早期行心肺运动试验。
EuroIntervention. 2011 Jun;7(2):242-7. doi: 10.4244/EIJV7I2A39.
7
Use of FemoStop system for arterial puncture site closure after coronary angioplasty.冠状动脉成形术后使用FemoStop系统封闭动脉穿刺部位。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2004 Jun;16(6):A16-21.
8
Rapid hemostasis of arterial puncture sites with Angio-Seal in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者使用血管封堵器实现动脉穿刺部位的快速止血。
Acta Med Indones. 2005 Apr-Jun;37(2):87-90.
9
Prospective nonrandomized trial of manual compression and Angio-Seal and Starclose arterial closure devices in common femoral punctures.普通股动脉穿刺中手动压迫与Angio-Seal和Starclose动脉闭合装置的前瞻性非随机试验
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2007 Mar-Apr;30(2):182-8. doi: 10.1007/s00270-006-0226-1.
10
A randomized trial comparing compression, Perclose Proglide and Angio-Seal VIP for arterial closure following percutaneous coronary intervention: the CAP trial.一项比较压迫止血、Perclose Proglide血管缝合器和Angio-Seal VIP血管闭合装置用于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后动脉闭合的随机试验:CAP试验。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Jan 1;71(1):1-5. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21333.

引用本文的文献

1
ULTrasound-guided TRAnsfemoral puncture in COmplex Large bORe PCI: study protocol of the UltraCOLOR trial.超声引导经股动脉复杂大腔 PCI 穿刺:UltraCOLOR 试验研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 1;12(12):e065693. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065693.